Search for: "Grant v. Arkansas Supreme Court" Results 481 - 500 of 627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2012, 10:20 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Mensing, in which the United States Supreme Court couldn’t find a federal statute or regulation in support of granting generic drug manufacturers legal immunity and so contrived an argument the Court admitted “makes little sense,” or Garza v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
John Lynch of the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette previews Blueford v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am by John Ottaviani
Earlier this year, the Arkansas Supreme Court found that a waiver of coverage in an online insurance application constitutes a "writing" for purposes of the Arkansas insurance law requirng such waivers to be in writing. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:19 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Supreme Court, in the case of Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am by Joshua Matz
Arkansas, in which cert. was granted last week. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:09 pm by brian
The Supreme Court’s decision this week to review the constitutionality of life-without-parole sentences imposed upon individuals convicted of homicide crimes committed at age fourteen and younger in Miller v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 1:40 pm by Stephen Wermiel
Evan Miller, the petitioner in one of the cases granted on Monday, Miller v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am by Lyle Denniston
In addition to granting those cases, the Court agreed to hear an appeal by local officials in St. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:00 pm by Amy Howe
The other grant that week was Blueford v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  TIME discusses one of last week’s grants, Blueford v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:12 pm by Viking
All links to documents from SCOTUSBlog or the Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Arkansas, 10-1320, which presents the question whether the Double Jeopardy Clause bars reprosecution for a greater offense if a jury deadlocks on a lesser-included offense and announces that it has voted against guilt on the greater offense; the Court granted in that case. [read post]