Search for: "Graphic Packaging"
Results 481 - 500
of 801
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 1:54 pm
In November, TeenJury reported on a temporary halt to the Food and Drug Administration’s plan to require that cigarette manufacturers place graphic warning labels on their packaging. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:07 pm
Beginning in Fall 2012, these new warnings must occupy the top half of the front and back of all cigarette packages, and must occupy 20% of all cigarette and smokeless tobacco advertising. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Food & Drug Administration (Docket No. 10-5234/5235), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld controversial FDA regulations mandating that tobacco companies display graphic warnings about the dangers of smoking on cigarette packages and advertisements.As reported by the law blog of The Wall St. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
Food & Drug Administration (Docket No. 10-5234/5235), the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has upheld controversial FDA regulations mandating that tobacco companies display graphic warnings about the dangers of smoking on cigarette packages and advertisements.As reported by the law blog of The Wall St. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 11:42 am
Torvik posted about a a district court judge in Washington D.C. who ruled that tobacco companies could not be forced to devote the top 50% of both the front and back of cigarette packages to "graphics depicting the negative consequences of smoking. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 4:34 pm
It's difficult to characterize some of these claims, but I am going to give it a shot: Free Speech: Graphic Images Required on Cigarette Packages by the U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Both plain packaging and visual display bans – as well as graphic warnings and smoking bans – seem potentially capable of nudging citizens away from consumption of tobacco products. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
According to the Consultation Paper, Australia would also require that all tobacco packets be coloured a shade of dark olive brown with matt finish and that cigarette packets display graphic health warnings that cover 75 per cent of the front of the packet in addition to the one already covering 90 per cent of the back, together with a further warning to cover one of the side panels. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:26 pm
Challenges Judge Ruling on Cigarette Graphic Warnings The U.S. government appealed a federal judge’s ruling throwing out requirements for graphic warning labels regarding the health risks of cigarettes. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:14 am
The Canadian government regulates and taxes the tobacco industry, and has imposed graphic warnings on cigarette packages in recent years. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 12:36 pm
* Mandatory graphic images on cigarette packages violates the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm
And the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did just that, recently requiring that all cigarette advertising carry graphic warnings on their packaging, similar to that required in Europe. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:31 am
The imagery from the ultra-sound does not provide the woman or doctor any meaningful, truthful factual information, any more than do the graphic images on the cigarette packages. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
In a bizarre opinion this week, Judge Richard Leon of the D.C. district court misapplied First Amendment law to strike down a regulation of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that would require graphic warning labels on cigarette packages and advertisements. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:22 am
By Ricardo Carvajal - Last November, we noted that FDA’s regulation requiring the display on cigarette packages of graphic warnings intended to dissuade would-be smokers appeared in jeopardy at the hands of U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
[JURIST] A judge for the US District Court for the District of Columbia [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF; order, PDF] Wednesday that a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [official website] regulation [text] requiring cigarette packaging and advertisements to display more prominent graphic health warning labels [materials] is unconstitutional, issuing a permanent injunction. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:16 am
" These graphics are to take up 50% of the front and back panels of cigarette packages, and 20% of all printed advertising. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:52 am
For years, cigarette packaging has been required to carry Surgeon General Warnings. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:48 am
Leon this week granted a preliminary injunction to tobacco companies challenging Food & Drug Administration regulations requiring cigarette packaging to carry graphic depictions of the health consequences of smoking.Last August, R.J. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
* A federal judge tossed out a law requiring tobacco companies to put graphic warning labels on cigarette packages. [read post]
