Search for: "Grey v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
The response seemed to be for the actual gambling hosting websites to move safely offshore, leading to undue pressure from states against payment intermediaries, so as to starve the unauthorised gambling sites of funds; yet, on the whole, these strategies merely multiplied bureaucracy and were still unsuccessful, since the grey market found ways round them (as it did, I noted, when similar strategies were applied to stimey offshore illegal music sites like AllofMP3.com in Russia). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
Cranmer accepted a commission to write a propaganda treatise in the king’s interest, stating the course he proposed and defending it by arguments from Scripture, the Fathers, and the decrees of general councils. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 5:41 pm
Some commentators believe that there is a risk that Congress, state legislatures, and state attorneys’ general will use the percentages of community benefit and uncompensated care in the Report to establish inflexible minimum community benefit standards similar to the minimum standards introduced by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan in 2005, and which have repeatedly been proposed by Senator Charles Grassley. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
Most recently, in 2015, the Supreme Court ruled in Reed v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 11:59 am
Both sides can appeal a decision to the Council (generally stating reasonable grounds such as procedure or new information). [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
” For years cryptocurrencies have occupied a relatively grey regulatory area. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
Important to note for client privacy purposes, a 501(c) (4) is not required to disclose the names of its donors.[13] However, depending on what state the 501(c)(4) operates, such information may be requested by such state, but public disclosure of donor information is still a grey area which is arguably invalid on federal or state constitutional grounds.[14] Florida does not currently expand any required federal disclosures, which may mean there is a desire by the… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am
” McCool intended to leverage the fact that state court judges are elected to sway how the judges ruled. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am
Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 6:51 pm
Skolnick v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 9:50 pm
Check out Scott Greenfield's post on Berghuis v. [read post]
