Search for: "Guess ? Holdings, Inc." Results 481 - 500 of 1,047
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2014, 10:05 am
Business rival Charming Heights, Inc. applies to revoke the mark for non-use. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
Our best guess is that the Court is holding this duo for their compatriot, James v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Jan. 30, 2014) (“Actos”); In re Ethicon, Inc. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Google, Inc., No. 12-57302 (9th Cir. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:46 am by Robert Kraft
Merritt holds a life, accident and health insurance license, and a principal associate real estate broker’s license. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 6:07 pm by Daniel Shaviro
 Just to capture what I am guessing might be the standard guess, perhaps the common view would hold that GE is, say 80% owned by American individuals, and Siemens, say, less than 5%. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am by Florian Mueller
Cir.] to provide guidance led to a wrong and dangerous ruling in WildTangent, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Denisha Lawson was a California prisoner in a community-based correctional facility operated by Center Point, Inc., where she lived with her infant daughter Esperanza. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
Whether the con artists ultimately wind up hating, loving, holding, or despising is anyone's guess. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:06 am by Peter Mahler
My guess, however, is that such agreements are relatively infrequent given the great preponderance of small, member managed, minimally capitalized companies formed each year in New York as LLCs. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:56 am
Whether the con artists ultimately wind up hating, loving, holding, or despising is anyone's guess. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
” This rule is designed to prevent courts from second-guessing the decisions of directors and officers. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
” This rule is designed to prevent courts from second-guessing the decisions of directors and officers. [read post]