Search for: "Gump v. Gump" Results 481 - 500 of 536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Re-listed case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Title: Javitch, Block & Rathbone, LLP v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
Let’s start with the oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am by Law Shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
Leblang, and Jason Sison, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Monday, November 19, 2018 Tags: Carl Icahn, Dell, Fairness review, Hedge funds, IPOs, Mergers & acquisitions, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, Shareholder meetings, Shareholder voting Bull or Bear? [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 6:08 am
Burdick, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, on Sunday, January 22, 2017 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Antitrust, Board composition, Boards of Directors, Brexit, CFIUS, Cybersecurity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Europe, Executive Compensation, International governance, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities regulation, Shareholder activism, UK Mutual Funds As Venture Capitalists? [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm by law shucks
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of their First Mondays podcast, Dan Epps and Ian Samuel talk to two Supreme Court practitioners at Akin Gump about “the strategy behind the firm’s win in Patchak v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
  (Disclosure: Akin Gump represented the petitioner in the case.) [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner.) [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
Skowron was repped by Akin Gump’s James J. [read post]