Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 481 - 500 of 2,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 31758 (ND NY, March 9, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing the complaint of a Rastafarian inmate that he was permitted to wear his crown (a religious head covering) only in his cell and housing unit, and not outside of these areas.In Peele v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm by Joe Patrice
[Bloomberg View] * A California lawyer is proposing a new law to address homosexuality with "bullets to the head or by any other convenient method. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
California Biker Attorney and California Motorcycle Accident LawyerOriginal post blogged on b2evolution. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:24 pm by Gene Takagi
The 6-3 decision in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 18148 (SD CA, Feb. 8, 2017), a California federal district court dismissed an inmate's claim that a change in the schedule for his prison job violated his right to practice his religion.In Martinez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:22 am
California - The Federal Circuit affirmed the Delaware district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law in favor of noninfringement and conclusion that the patents at issue were not unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 2:28 pm
 Perhaps someone like Liscotti.So that argument I could get my head around. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:00 am by Lorene Park
In a May 2012 decision, a California appeals court ruled that an arbitration agreement was unconscionable and unenforceable (Samaniego v Empire Today LLC). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:17 pm by Brad Kuhn
This week, the California Court of Appeal issued an unpublished decision, City of South Gate v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 1:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
On September 9, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) filed an “Order Modifying Opinion and Denying Rehearing [No Change In Judgment]” in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]