Search for: "HUGHES v. HUGHES"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 1:13 am
Welcome to Day 2 of our live blog following the appeal brought by Mastercard concerning class certification under the UK’s collective action regime. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 10:06 am
In the case of Stichting Ostade Blade v Netherlands (App 8406/06, 27 May 2014) the Third Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an Article 10 application by a Dutch magazine arising out of a police raid was inadmissible. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law at Matrix Chambers and an editor of Inforrm. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
In the case of Milosavljević v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 5:10 am
Last week, I mentioned that I was reading The Price of Justice - the true story of Caperton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:33 pm
This is the second time that the Strasbourg Court has considered the right to be forgotten (we wrote about the Court’s judgment in the Article 8 case of ML & WW v Germany, 28 June 2018, in an earlier post). [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 4:55 am
Guy Vassall-Adams QC and Hugh Tomlinson QC are members of Matrix Chambers and the editors of Online Publication Claims: a Practical Guide. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm
In the case of Rubio Dosamantes v Spain (Judgment of 21 February 2017)(in French only) the Third Section held that the dismissal of the applicant’s domestic claims was a breach of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:31 am
Brad Hughes, there is an in-depth discussion about the history of this statute. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Nov. 15, 2021 Hughes, J.), may be viewed at this LINK.The court Order in Harenza v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:08 pm
Hughes & Luce, L.L.P., 312 S.W.3d 62, 67 (Tex. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 1:34 pm
Nov. 22, 2012 Hughes, J.)Polacheck v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 3:01 pm
A recent article found in the July/August 2009 issue of Probate & Property by Sebastian V. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 3:58 am
On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1513 This appeal considered whether the losses suffered by the Appellant were losses which the Respondent owed a duty to protect him against, and whether the losses suffered by the Appellant are otherwise recoverable from the Respondent. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
This is a live blog of the appeal brought by Mastercard concerning class certification under the UK’s collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 am
On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 674 A majority of the Supreme Court has dismissed this appeal concerning the procedure for collective proceedings in competition damages claims, the first collective proceedings case of this kind to reach the Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
In Abbott v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 3:04 am
No entitlement to trial Regina (Singh) v Stratford Magistrates Court “Where a hospital or guardianship order was made under section 37(1) of the Mental Health Act 1983, there was no entitlement to a trial under section 37(3). [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
Mossberg & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
