Search for: "Hall v. Law" Results 481 - 500 of 4,518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by INFORRM
In Parks v Hall & Anr [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB) Sir Andrew Nicol recently addressed the question of quite how much indulgence litigants-in-person should be afforded in libel claim before a case is struck out. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
Alas, the ideology of the Woke has arrived in the halls of the American Medical Association (AMA). [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 6:34 am by Chloe Pettiti
In relation to the first question, the Supreme Court said it was correctly held in the Court of Appeal decision in Vidal-Hall v Google [2015] EWCA Civ 311 that section 13 of the DPA could not be construed as providing a general right to compensation for distress suffered as a result of a breach of the DPA “without contradicting the cl [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am by INFORRM
The judgment includes a comprehensive survey of the case law on representative actions going back over 150 years. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:54 am by Leila Rafei
v=mc0vdNM95VQThe plaintiffs are represented by the Center for Immigration Law and Policy at UCLA School of Law, the ACLU of Southern California, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Council for American-Islamic Relations – California (CAIR-CA), and the law firm of Hadsell Stormer Renick & Dai. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm by INFORRM
” Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Nassif v Seven Network [2021] FCA 1286. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The Police Officials' charge of disloyalty makes sense only if Kinney and Hall owe fealty to law enforcement universally. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
Narratives of litigation abuse were rampant in the national media and gaining steam in Washington, D.C., from the K Street lobby firms to the halls on Capitol Hill. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts Judgement was handed down in Parkes v Hall and Ors [2021] EWHC 2824 (QB). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am by INFORRM
In the case of Fairhurst v Woodard [pdf] in the Oxford County Court, Judge Melissa Clarke held that security cameras and a Ring doorbell “unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbour, broke data laws and contributed to harassment. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
On 21 October 2021, Columbia Global Freedom of Expression are holding an online event, “Courts and Global Norms on Freedom of Expression” (2.00 pm to 5.00pm, BST) Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Gan v Zadravic [2021] NSWDC 533 the NSW District Court refused to dismiss a summary libel claim based on a Facebook post. [read post]