Search for: "Hamburg v. Hamburg"
Results 481 - 500
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 1:59 am
Not that any pathogen finding is good, but at least one of the sources was told his cucumbers were seen spilled on the ground at the Hamburg Central Produce market. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
(Uncle Leo in Seinfeld, who tells Jerry the diner cook must be an anti-Semite because Leo ordered a medium rare hamburger and instead got one that was medium–“they don’t just overcook a hamburger, Jerry”—comes to mind.)Does this mean it would have been less incendiary to accuse a judge of ideological bias having nothing to do with race than to suggest ethnic attitudes were a factor? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 9:30 pm
The major hamburger chains were the major purchasers of zebu. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:04 pm
From Judge Stephen Clark's opinion in Steak N Shake, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 2:20 am
Öztürk v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
[6] Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), sometimes also referred to as genetic fingerprinting, is used to compare E. coliO157:H7 isolates to determine if the strains are distinguishable. [3, 7] A technique called multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) is used to determine precise classification when it is difficult to differentiate between isolates with indistinguishable or very similar PFGE patterns. [8] E. coli O157:H7… [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
[6] Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE),sometimes also referred to as genetic fingerprinting, is used to compare E. coliO157:H7 isolates to determine if the strains are distinguishable. [3, 7] A technique called multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis (MLVA) is used to determine precise classification when it is difficult to differentiate between isolates with indistinguishable or very similar PFGE patterns. [8] E. coli O157:H7 was… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:16 am
Complaint: The Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm
Another exclusivity provision originally included in FDAAA, but removed and later enacted as part of the QI Act, that is targeted to so-called “old” antibiotics (i.e., FDC Act § 505(v)) is not discussed in the GAO’s report, presumably because of the limited scope of the GAO report. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:59 am
It says the board "must be satisfied that the degree of exceptionality is the same as, or is approximately the same as, in the facts found in the case of Steel and Morris v United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:15 am
Murder thus became the next logical step.Nazi Era Laws - Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression - Translated More information on Bakalar v Vavra, a recent Second Circuit case interpreting the April 26, 1938 Jewish Property declaration decree here.More on Austria's violations of the Austrian State Treaty here.A report on how the Museum of Modern Art in New York is the largest repository in the nation of Nazi looted art coming in through Switzerland here. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
by Bettina Clefsen “In a decision of this year, the District Court of Hamburg confirmed that an online-magazine article about so-called perfume dupes being “smell alikes” of well-known perfumes amounted to trademark infringement (decision of 26 January in Case 327 O 130/22). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:16 am
Complaint: The Center for Food Safety and Center for Environmental Health v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
Arbitration Agreements, Anti-Suit Injunctions and the Brussels Regulation Martin Illmer (Hamburg) and Ingrid Naumann (Berlin, currently New York)... [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
by Bettina Clefsen “In a decision of this year, the District Court of Hamburg confirmed that an online-magazine article about so-called perfume dupes being “smell alikes” of well-known perfumes amounted to trademark infringement (decision of 26 January in Case 327 O 130/22). [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 8:00 pm
The District Court’s decision denying the City’s motion to dismiss in Church of Our Savior v City of Jacksonville Beach, 2014 WL 35897494 (MD FLA 7/18/2014) Filed under: Current Caselaw, RLUIPA [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:03 am
Supreme Court’s January 2007 decision in Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 8:00 pm
., V.7., N.3 (2023). [read post]
