Search for: "Harrington v. Harrington" Results 481 - 500 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
Finally, Part IV contains just one paper, a special comparative article by Matthew Harrington from the Université de Montréal, “Unwritten Principles and the American Constitution. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:53 am by Ronald Mann
The second of the Court’s trademark cases this week was Hana Financial, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:15 pm by Jeff Gamso
  That's so last century.This year, in Harrington v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:05 am by Mike "No Man" Navarre
Below are observations of the NIMJ volunteer observer at the proceedings in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm by John Elwood
James12-11Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion conflicts with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and this Court's decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 10:59 am
Harrington after he became a supernumerary judge in April.Keith Boswell of Stewart McKelvey to the Federal Court. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am by Brian Shiffrin
Harrington, 562 U.S. at 101 (“Strickland does not establish that a cursory investigation automatically justifies a tactical decision.... [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:02 pm by Stephen Page
The case, Taglieri v Monasky involved a court order for the return of a child who was 2 months when taken from Italy by her mother to the US to be returned to Italy. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:31 am by Mary Dwyer
Pinholster, which held that habeas review is limited to the record that was before the state court; and (3) whether the decision of the Second Circuit affords the state court the deference required by 28 U.S.C § 2254(d), as interpreted by this Court in Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by John Elwood
Sellers16-6855Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]