Search for: "High Point LLC" Results 481 - 500 of 3,135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2010, 5:05 am by Nicole Vinson
I began to notice how the words of the company used pointed in one direction…but the actions we took tended to point in another, very different direction…. [read post]
Earlier, in 2013, the New Mexico Supreme Court held that a wedding photography company’s refusal to photograph a same-sex couple’s commitment ceremony constituted discrimination based on sexual orientation in violation of that state’s law (Elane Photography, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Tomassi Law Associates
In the final year, it could be as high as 48 cents per kilowatt hour. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 4:15 am
Fine Spirits Distribution, LLC, Opposition No. 91175854 (May 22, 2008) [not precedential].Fine Spirits first moved to suspend proceedings, claiming settlement negotiations. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 8:41 pm by Benjamin Beaton and Barrett Block
Like a Sergio Leone scene, the Sixth Circuit issued an explosive en banc denial of CIC Services LLC v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 1:29 pm by zamansky
This is the ugly reemergence of high-risk activity used by hedge funds and banks. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:35 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, No. 12-CV-01828, 2014 WL 27527 (N.D. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Jack Sharman
About the same time, film technology had progressed to the point that newspaper-photographers could take high quality photographs while everyone – photographer, handcuffed defendant and law enforcement – was on the move. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 12:18 pm
At that point, the desk should have alerted LPL officials to Kleckandrsquo;s conduct, but it did not. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 8:02 am by Dennis Crouch
  On appeal, the Federal Circuit affirmed on this point as well — finding that the Board “correctly determined that a high level of proof was required. [read post]
3 May 2023, 12:41 pm by Maribeth Meluch
As the dissent points out in this decision, such requirement may run afoul of the First Amendment as unlawful compelled speech. [read post]