Search for: "Holland v. U.s" Results 481 - 500 of 521
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 7:07 am by Clara Apt
” It’s Time to Prepare More Seriously for the Next. by Nikita Lalwani (@nikitaalalwani), Alasdair Phillips-Robins (@alasdairpr) and Sam Winter Levy (@SamWinterLevy) (June 15, 2021)  The U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
 Part III stresses that under current U.S. law directors should have a duty to hedge. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
  Id.To get around TwIqbal, the plaintiffs in Ali trotted out Hofts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:12 pm by Javier Dominguez
I started at Holland and Knight, which is a large, national law firm. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
The ruling is the first upholding a federal ban on a specific abortion procedure since the Court declared the right to an abortion in Roe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Beatrice Yahia
Trevor Hunnicutt and Steve Holland report for Reuters. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm by Aaron Moss
A screenwriter might be able to argue that the employer-employee relationship set forth in a loan-out arrangement, while sufficient to satisfy the tax code, doesn’t satisfy the multi-factor agency test used by the U.S. [read post]