Search for: "Hong v. Hong" Results 481 - 500 of 1,291
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong The DLA Piper Privacy Matters Blog has covered developments in Hong Kong’s data protection regime. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Hong Kong The Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data has followed up on privacy concerns over the collection and integration of user’s personal data by three mobile apps with “call-blocking” function. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Terry Hart
” Fourth Circuit overturns massive jury verdict in copyright case against internet service provider — Attorney Evan Brown looks at this week’s Fourth Circuit decision in Sony Music Entertainment v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
To Reconsider Oracle's Copyright Win https://t.co/EPGjRv6QhJ 2018-05-30 Japan Calls for Emergency Measure to Block Piracy Sites https://t.co/lStnhlCGpv 2018-05-30 Hollywood Pushes to Expand Swedish Pirate Bay Blockade – TorrentFreak https://t.co/738XPcuLov 2018-05-30 NAFTA: Tug-of-war unfolding over concluding a quick deal https://t.co/BHw6bxf5TA 2018-05-30 Social Media: the Free Speech Paradox – Patrick George https://t.co/n9qqS3RwzL 2018-05-30 Redfin Must Defend Copyright Suit… [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:50 am by Jan von Hein
The volume is edited by Jan von Hein, Hanno Merkt, Sonja Meier, Alexander Bruns, Yuanshi Bu, Silja Vöneky, Michael Pawlik, and Eiji Takahashi. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:37 pm
One case which may find itself being resurrected is the old Privy Council authority of Hip Foong Hong v H Neotia and Company [1918] AC 889 in which Lord Buckmaster comments on the issue of tainting in the following way:"A Judgment that is tainted and effected by fraudulent conduct is tainted throughout and the whole must fail …"However, that case dealt with the opium trade and was an appeal from a decision in the Shanghai Supreme Court and arguments… [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 3:19 am
Australian Communications and Media Authority v Mobilegate Ltd A Company Incorporated in Hong Kong [2009] FCA 539 '); //--> [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by Sean Hayes
V & T (Zhang Zi, Proficient in English Conversation, Hong Kong educated) _________ SeanHayes@ipglegal.comIPG is engaged in projects in Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, Korea, Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam and the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Kevin
Amount of judgment in Leviston v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:29 pm by Eunice R. Chung
 Following welcomes from Ann Ford (Chair of the US Trademark, Copyright and Media Practice) and Ruth Hoy (Co-Chair of the Fashion, Retail and Design Group), we were taken on a whistlestop global tour, stopping along the way at: the Ninth Circuit's findings on copyright misuse in Omega v Costco (Gina Durham, Chicago), new advantages for brand owners entering the Italian franchising market (Giangiacomo Olivi, Milan), options for businesses using a designer's name as their brand… [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:58 am by Apeng
(cnipr.com) A comparison between patent systems of Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainliand China/ ??????????? [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 5:31 am by INFORRM
 We have had over 450,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, Australia, Hong Kong and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 12:45 pm by Emily Dai
Stewart Baker shared an episode of The Cyberlaw Podcast, featuring interviews with Jordan Schneider to discuss recent Beijing tech policy, Michael Weiner to unpack FTC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 1:09 am by Neil Wilkof
This question was considered recently in the decision in Singapore of Baidu Europe B.V. v Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. [2021] SGIPOS 8. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
I am delighted to pass along an announcement for a CfP for Legal Imaginaries —  a Law, Literature and Humanities Association of Australasia Conference and hosted by the University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Whether a proffered excuse is reasonable is a sui generis determination to be made by the court based on all relevant factors, including the extent of the delay, whether there has been prejudice to the opposing party, whether there has been willfulness, and the strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits” (Nowakowski v Stages, 179 AD3d 822, 823 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Jinwu Yu v Hong Qin Jiang, 205 AD3d 1012, 1013). [read post]