Search for: "Horn v. State" Results 481 - 500 of 851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2013, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
Bartlett – must a maker of a generic drug that allegedly caused harm to a patent take the drug off the market if that is the only way it can obey both federal drug law and state drug product law Wednesday, March 20: 12-123 — Horne v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Trent Horne and Edward (Ted) Yoo In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court of Canada has provided valuable guidance to patent agents and litigators as to how Canadian patents will be read and enforced (Teva Canada Limited v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2012 SCC 60). [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 11:33 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Recently, we and others suggested paying attention to the property rights cases on the Supreme Court's cert docket, paying particular attention to a case out of the Ninth Circuit, Horne v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:54 am
Judge Birss took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:38 pm
HHJ Birss QC took the opportunity of the question session to explain that in certain cases, where the parties agree, he may be prepared to give preliminary views on the case during a Case Management Conference and/or deal with cases on paper (as was done in Hoffmann v DARE). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Cato Institute, the National Federation of Independent Business, the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, and the Reason Foundation have filed an amicus brief in Horne v. [read post]