Search for: "Hughes v. Hughes" Results 481 - 500 of 2,709
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the Hughes Court justices have been held by the Office of the Curator of the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 10:16 am by Christine Corcos
For many years, the docket books kept by a number of the Hughes Court justices have been held by the Office of the Curator of the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in Cooper v Evans & Anor [2023] EWHC 2555 (KB) in favour of the defendants. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The majority, however, buries Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [1989] AC 53 – whose public policy justifications have been inverted. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 3:30 pm
Roger Falk and Christopher Hughes won in State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am by INFORRM
Criteria to be applied In contrast to the Chamber, the Grand Chamber considered that the Axel Springer criteria for balancing Articles 8 and 10 (see Axel Springer v Germany [2012] ECHR 227)) were not applicable. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by INFORRM
([2001] QB 967) Campbell v MGN ([2004] 2 AC 457), McKennitt v Ash ([2008] QB 73), Lord Browne of Madingley v Associated Newspapers ([2008] 1 QB 103), Murray v Express Newspapers ([2009] Ch 481), Donald v Ntuli ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) and, most recently, JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
It is well established that the exemption applies both before and after publication (see Campbell v MGN [2003] QB 633). [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a specialist in media and information law and an editor of Inforrm     [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
NGN applied to strike out claims by Hugh Grant and Prince Harry on limitation grounds. [read post]