Search for: "ILLINOIS v. WASHINGTON" Results 481 - 500 of 1,737
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Clark In the last year, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington State passed game-changing laws that restrict the enforceability of provisions between an employer and an employee that limit the employee’s post-termination ability to work in competition with the employer. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:09 am by Florian Mueller
The key antitrust issue here is this: Illinois Brick doesn't give indirect purchasers (here, the consumers bought phones, but the makers of those devices paid patent royalties to Qualcomm) standing to seek damages under federal antitrust laws; but many states have, as some say, "repealed" (or one might also say "worked around") Illinois Brick by allowing such claims under state competition laws. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
” The homes of the first three of those justices are all National Historic Landmarks, as are those of at least six other justices: Justice Louis Brandeis (Chatham, Massachusetts) Justice David Davis (Bloomington, Illinois) Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (Beverly, Massachusetts) Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes (Washington, D.C.) [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
They include: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Washington, and West Virginia.Children deserve to live free from preventable disease, and infants, ill children, pregnant women, and the elderly deserve not to be exposed to preventable diseases. [read post]