Search for: "IN RE: ARNOLD"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
The Court’s reluctance last year to interfere with parties’ freedom of contract is also apparent in the contractual interpretation case of Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36 (Case Comment here). [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 12:28 pm
Matt Arnold of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “If I am injured in a car accident or at work what should I do? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:30 am
” Counsel for the Redskins, Quinn Emanuel and Arnold & Porter, argue that this notion is disturbing. [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
A very belated (and brief) note on Arnold v Britton & Ors [2015] UKSC 36, as I have just realised we didn’t cover it. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:30 am
Harry Styles and Justin Beiber, eat your heart out.Answers: A (Baroness Neville-Rolfe), B (Justice Arnold), C (Justice Birss), D (Sir Robin Jacob), E (Professor Hargreaves) and F (Julia Reda.) [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am
The respondent, Mrs Arnold, was the freehold owner of the leisure park and the lessor of the above leases (the lessor). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 10:07 am
While the tribunes deliberated, Lisa Blatt from Arnold & Porter briefly interviewed Anne Anderson, Ireland’s ambassador to the United States. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 6:25 am
Grits mentioned I've been re-reading her Gideon by the Numbers. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 8:58 am
There’re even lawyers who’re willing to represent a client facing financial hardship who will grant permission to use their case in advertising in lieu of payment. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
They're not very good at policing their own, Mark Bennett's on-point blog screeds notwithstanding. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:24 am
[Virgin Atlantic spokesman David] Arnold, responding to a subsequent email asking whether Mr. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 3:30 pm
I know we here at LexBlog are incredibly thankful of not only for work we’re able to do, but the people we’re able to work with. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
Presumably the Sandoz decision does not come under this numbering, so we can call the latest decision Warner-Lambert VI.In a nutshell, Arnold J considered that there was no problem with the deletion of the invalid claims, but that the amendment to re-write claim 3 (relating to neuropathic pain) was an abuse of process. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:06 am
Following an outline of the respective enforcement regimes under English and Chinese law by our very own Justice Colin Birss and former Deputy Presiding Judge of the IP Division of Beijing High People’s Court, Cheng Yongshun respectively, Carol Arnold (President of the IP Federation) discussed the perceptions and the reality of litigating IP rights in China.The perception of taking legal action in China has been simply that foreign companies cannot win a court case against local… [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 9:05 am
Finally, once the case is officially withdrawn, you will have one year to think it over and, should things not improve, re-file. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 12:34 am
It's another Patents Court, England and Wales, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold [the history of the litigation can be gleaned by reading a whole host of Katposts here], which Jeremy reports in this post. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of… [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
It's another Patents Court, England and Wales, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold, dating back to last Wednesday. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
., 843 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Ark. 1992); Arnold v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:53 am
While we’re on the subject of workplace injury, a poorly understood aspect of workers’ comp claims is how the system operates on a no-fault basis. [read post]
