Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 481 - 500
of 950
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 4:40 pm
In response, Inforrm asked: Does the Act “reverse the chilling effect on freedom of expression of current libel law” or is it damp squib which will make defamation cases more complex? [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 2:02 am
See, for example, McKeogh v John Doe [2012] IEHC 95, or the recent jurisdictional issues in the cases of Coleman and CSI Manufacturing (reported on Inforrm here). [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 5:20 am
There has been a considerable level of activity on the Inforrm Blog over the past month – with more than 60 new posts on a wide variety of legal and media topics. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
This post updates Inforrm’s previous posts dealing of defamation cases, which tracked “Defamation Trials, Summary Determinations and Assessments” in 2011-2012, 2011; 2010 and 2005-2009. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 7:01 am
(Hat-tip to INFORRM and Ashley Hurst, who have documented both phases of the consultation.) [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
And John Bolch – provider of a very comprehensive review of analysis and comment on his Family Lore blog – has also created Edgar Venal, a man who lives up to his name and who is the senior partner of Venal & Grabbit, Solicitors Inforrm’s blog: Can you help the Campaign for Freedom of Information? [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
And John Bolch – provider of a very comprehensive review of analysis and comment on his Family Lore blog – has also created Edgar Venal, a man who lives up to his name and who is the senior partner of Venal & Grabbit, Solicitors Inforrm’s blog: Can you help the Campaign for Freedom of Information? [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am
Corrigendum: As pointed out by Jon Baines on the Twitter: @bainesy1969: Hugh Tomlinson, Q.C. over at Inforrm’s Blog adds: In the circumstances, a reader who knew the background – the “Newsnight” broadcast, the media reports and Lord McAlpine’s status as a “Conservative politician from the Thatcher years” – might well have inferred that the Tweet meant: “Lord McAlpine is trending on Twitter because he is the child abuser is the… [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am
Corrigendum: As pointed out by Jon Baines on the Twitter: @bainesy1969: Hugh Tomlinson, Q.C. over at Inforrm’s Blog adds: In the circumstances, a reader who knew the background – the “Newsnight” broadcast, the media reports and Lord McAlpine’s status as a “Conservative politician from the Thatcher years” – might well have inferred that the Tweet meant: “Lord McAlpine is trending on Twitter because he is the child abuser is the… [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
Ten ways in which copyright engages freedom of expression, Part 2: Sliders six to ten – Graham Smith
3 May 2013, 5:05 pm
Part 1 was published on Inforrm on 2 May 2012. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Inforrm’s report can be found here. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 5:02 pm
Facebook Ireland Limited and Another [2013] NIQB 14, (see the Inforrm post here) and of course the potential for a service provider like Google to be liable for defamation after receipt of a complaint: Tamiz v Google. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
A number of provisions of the Bill were criticised by academics, for example, Professor Alastair Mullis and Dr Andrew Scott (see their posts here and here on Inforrm). [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am
As Inforrm noted here, in a post examining the detail of the Amendments, there were 16 Lords Amendments. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:32 am
Inforrm has responded to the consultation and we urge all our readers who blog or run other small publications to do so as well [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
There has, over the last few months, been widespread criticism from the press of Lord Justice Leveson’s recommendations about exemplary damages. [read post]
