Search for: "In Re: Andrews v." Results 481 - 500 of 1,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2019, 9:05 pm by Marissa Martino Golden
For example, in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[71] Justice Arbour noted that, in explaining the standard to a jury, it might be preferable to re-word the standard of causation using positive terms, for example, a phrase such as a “‘significant contributing cause’ rather than using expressions phrased in the negative such as ‘not a trivial cause’ or ‘not insignificant’. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
President Andrew Johnson and his allies hoped to carry out a swift reconstruction, requiring only that southern states ratify the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, repudiate all war debts, and void ordinances of succession.17 The Radical Republicans, led by the “Dictator of Congress,” Rep. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
    Long before the elections of 2016, the American Republic had been moving toward more formal and open hostilities in the cultural civil war, one with social, economic, cultural and political consequences, that was one of the great consequences of the immediate post 1945 period. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The Nieman Lab has a post setting  out “12 principles journalists should follow to make sure they’re protecting their sources” – setting out the so-called “Perugia Principles”. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Here’s the amicus brief filed in November 2018 in Chicago v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:31 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The case is not final, pending the possibility of a motion for rehearing and the outcome of such a rehearing if it is granted, but interested persons should monitor its status.Assuming the Court’s opinion becomes final, it is difficult to know how counties with such mandatory requirements will react, both within and without the counties making up the Fourth DCA (such as whether they will remove such mandatory requirement, otherwise attempt to re-work their rules in light of the… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Richard Re previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The team, led by Professors Joan Loughrey, Andrew Keay and Terry McNulty shared their preliminary findings with a selected audience at the end of November 2018. [read post]