Search for: "In Re: Mark Green v."
Results 481 - 500
of 658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
” See Komas v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am
In Qualitex v Jacobson, (this was briefly discussed in my earlier blog post of non traditional trademarks) Qualitex sought protection over the green gold colour of their cleansing pads. [read post]
Very unsettling 9th Circuit "Betty Boop" decision on copyright and trademark in BETTY BOOP character
23 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm
Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
There is a long and detailed analysis of the Bill by Mark Elliott, Professor of Public Law and Chair of the Faculty of Law at Cambridge, here. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Also in Strasbourg at the moment is the Animal Defenders International v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 1:09 pm
Greene (1999), in which undisclosed police interview notes cast serious doubt on the eyewitness’s testimony. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The list is in alphabetical order, with the top of the list being tags that were originally written with quotation marks. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Frank’s initial memo: listened to both compositions and thought there was a marked resemblance, and so did his secretary, “who improvises music. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
My UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic students and I just filed a brief on this subject on behalf of the Libertarian Law Council and the Institute for Free Speech in Green v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
Green Edge Enter., LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 11:05 am
Expressive content of photos can be entirely unaltered—Dillon v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Sen. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Perhaps we have reached the stage of dealing with scientific evidence at which errant and aberrant cases should be retracted, and clearly marked as retracted in the official reporters, and in the electronic legal databases. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
This last comment reflects that of Wood Ch. in Re St Mark Haydock [2023] ECC Liv 2 that the chosen system, “whilst not perfect in terms of carbon emission, was nevertheless a significant stride forward compared to the current system”. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
., v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
