Search for: "In Re Fletcher"
Results 481 - 500
of 560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 6:22 am
"You have to think that these judges do have some valid reason for putting all this effort into the exercise than just feeling better about it after they're done," Mr. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:20 am
"You have to think that these judges do have some valid reason for putting all this effort into the exercise than just feeling better about it after they're done," Mr. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
This is a capitalist system, like it or not, and they're doing what they're supposed to. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
John Fletcher 40,393,217 55,214,528 Stephen R. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 12:02 pm
Fletcher / J. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
Id. at 7115.In one sense, we're happy: We generally root for defendants at this blog, but we'll get over that here. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:06 pm
When you're in desperate need of help, I guess rules, written or unwritten just don't apply. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:00 am
Lexis 4365], in which the Supreme Court noted in the context of interpreting Proposition 64's impact on class actions that its holdings in prior nonrestitutionary disgorgement cases "did not overrule any part of Fletcher v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:36 am
(Fletcher v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:26 pm
Fletcher. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:54 pm
If you're going to read one 100+ page dissent from the Ninth Circuit this year, this should be the one.I say that notwithstanding the fact -- and I know this will turn some people off -- that Judge Willie Fletcher's dissent contains a number of graphs and a number of references to r-squared statistics and the like. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:11 am
No space so we're cool. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 10:14 am
Fletcher / L. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:27 am
As earlier announced, Joel Trachtman of The Fletcher School, Paul Stephan of UVA, and yours truly will offer up our reviews, and Larry and Erin will respond. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:48 am
Does a defendant have the right to know they're going to get hammered, before the gavel falls? [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Yesterday morning, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in In re Tobacco II Cases, no. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
None other than Judge Willie Fletcher, who's on the panel here! [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Fletcher, 431 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Fletcher, 431 F. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Fletcher, 431 F. [read post]
