Search for: "In Re Ss"
Results 481 - 500
of 864
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2014, 5:03 pm
Except you never really get the reprieve (unless you’re slowly going out of business). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
APPEALS Courts/Supreme Court: AppointmentReference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 (Order in Council P.C. 2013-1105, October 22, 2013) (35586) Mar. 21, 2014 A lawyer with 10 years standing at the Barreau du Québec cannot be appointed to the S.C.C. pursuant to sections 5 and 6 of the Supreme Court Act, and Parliament cannot (except as a constitutional amendment) pass correcting legislation. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:21 am
This time it is no longer to play soccer with the priest but instead to watch helplessly his public execution at the hands of an impatient SS officer. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 2014 SCC 211] The Supreme Court Act provides that three of the nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada must be appointed “from among the judges of the Court of Appeal or of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec or from among the advocates of that Province”: R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
In jazz, studying “standards” and their re-composition according to performers’ unique musical tastes drives much musical education and innovation. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
For this last week: Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6 2014 SCC 211] The Supreme Court Act provides that three of the nine judges of the Supreme Court of Canada must be appointed “from among the judges of the Court of Appeal or of the Superior Court of the Province of Quebec or from among the advocates of that Province”: R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:56 am
The only restriction is that the court while doing so cannot re-write the contract. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:57 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, the Supreme Court of Canada, with only one Justice dissenting, concluded that Marc Nadon... [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
Then a few hours later I was re-hired. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 1:34 pm
Pauffley J in Re Y (A Child: Private Law: Fact Finding) (h/t Suesspicious Minds, who I think is probably beavering away now doing a proper post on this). [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:40 pm
Gemäss dem emeritierten Prof. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:11 am
The rights in ss.21, 22 were recent re-enactments of much older provisions. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:11 am
The rights in ss.21, 22 were recent re-enactments of much older provisions. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
In re Mortg. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:40 pm
As you’ll all know, ss.20, 20ZA, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, provide for consultation by landlords as a condition of recovery of service charges for certain kinds of works and/or services. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 12:40 pm
As you’ll all know, ss.20, 20ZA, Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, provide for consultation by landlords as a condition of recovery of service charges for certain kinds of works and/or services. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
., Mar. 26, 2012) (34788) Dec. 20, 2013Criminal Code ss. 210 (brothels), 212(1)(j) (pimping) 213(1)(c) (solicitation) all unconstitutional; judgment suspended one year. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 4:30 am
” It was mainly the Uniform Evidence Act with some re-organization and re-drafting. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am
2 or to suggest that a registrar under ss. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
[i] The Court re-affirmed these principles stating the following: The Copyright Act strikes “a balance between promoting the public interest in the encouragement and dissemination of works of the arts and intellect and obtaining a just reward for the creator… It seeks to ensure that an author will reap the benefits of his efforts, in order to incentivize the creation of new works. [read post]
