Search for: "In re: Asbesto Products"
Results 481 - 500
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
Ohio 1987); In re All Am. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 4:28 am
The scuttling of product liability claims includes a widow’s lawsuit for wrongful death of her husband from lung cancer. * A special bankruptcy law passed by Congress in 1994 controls the fate of asbestos claims; its provisions were not followed in the Chrysler transaction. * The decision of the bankruptcy court and the Second Circuit in this case conflict with a 2005 ruling of the Third Circuit Court holding that the special provisions for asbestos… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
Ohio 1987); In re All Am. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:31 am
In re Zyprexa Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 1596 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:50 pm
“The game that they’re playing is that the end justifies the means. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:58 pm
After a mildly productive cross-examination (where Wood repeatedly discussed his disgust for Locke's ideas), Cassidy yielded the floor to Bernick for re-direct. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:52 pm
"Certain diseases have very long latency periods, from the time you're exposed to the onset of the disease, therefore looking at what you have today doesn't tell you much about what you're going to see in the future," Wood said. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 12:54 pm
In an effort to eliminate the source of the odors, one of BloomSouth's subcontractors scraped up the original carpet adhesive and re-carpeted the floor. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:41 am
He added that the consumer products were cleaned to contain as little asbestos as possible, and that Walsh was saying that even at “low levels,” tremolite is a major health risk. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 3:24 pm
Is this the new asbestos? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 8:06 am
Sure, there are cheaper ways to address some of these needs, but at what cost to productivity? [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Asbestos Corp., 480 A.2d 647, 651 (Del. 1984), but did not categorically shut the door. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
App. 1971); In re Guidant Corp. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
They think they're helping but they're not. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
Interesting new decision out of the Asbestos MDL the other day, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Asbestos Corp., 480 A.2d 647, 651 (Del. 1984), an asbestos case (obviously), but that was as much because of lack of exposure as due to any evaluation of the viability of the underlying claim.Moreover, Guinan I stated that not only was medical monitoring itself uncertain under Delaware law, but plaintiffs advocated a "novel theory that a tort claim for medical monitoring can be applied to medical procedures and devices. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 3:45 am
In the “we’re just doing this for giggles” department is State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:22 am
You're right. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
