Search for: "In re: Wells, et al" Results 481 - 500 of 2,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.In re Star Scientific, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Bottom line: Marler, et al. are pariahs, hated by the major trade associations that serve the food industry. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Leave to Appeals Granted Civil Procedure/Class Actions: JurisdictionJ.W. and REO Law Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Don Cruse
Miesch, et al., No. 06-1076 (more info) I wrote about these cases back in 2007, and they have continued to get press attention. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:02 pm by David M. Ward
Choose a friend who is willing to send their clients or subscribers a copy of YOUR report (et al.). [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 6:10 am by Jessica Smith
See Matthew DeMichele et al., The Public Safety Assessment: A Re-Validation and Assessment of Predictive Utility and Differential Prediction by Race and Gender in Kentucky 24, 28 (April 30, 2018) (Working Paper), available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 5:49 pm
Baker et al., No. 08 CVS 22632 — offer the first indication of how courts will evaluate board decisions made in response to the extraordinary conditions created by the ongoing financial crisis. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 7:28 am by Gary Mason
KB Home North Carolina, et al., No. 08-CVS-21190 (N.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:20 pm by Josh Sturtevant
Absent a strong media or public consensus about the findings, it would be a lot easier for President Nixon et al to refute them, and wriggle free of being directly implicated. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
For example, Roger Hood, Stephen Shute, Martina Feilzer, and Aidan Wilcox (2002) found that only 7% of those released from prison for a sex offence were re-convicted for another sex offence within four years. [read post]