Search for: "In re Application of Johns" Results 481 - 500 of 6,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2006, 6:10 pm
Also see TMEP Section 1301.04(b) and the TTABlog posting here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 3:22 am
In re Mars, Inc., 105 USPQ2d 1859, 1866 (TTAB 2013).And so the Board sustained the opposition.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: Once a mark is tagged with the "highly descriptive" label, the ballgame is over.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by John L. Welch
In re Kinetic Energy Corporation, Serial No. 77707733 (May 31, 2011) [not precedential].Applicant's website and press releases indicated that its goods and services relate to the generation of power from the motion of vehicles. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:37 am
"The Board therefore concluded that the PTO had failed to meet its burden of proof, and so the refusals were reversed.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
5 Nov 2006, 1:12 pm
In re Physician Endorsed, LLC, Serial Nos. 78975107 and 78976952 (November 2, 2006) [not citable].Applicant Physician Endorsed, LLC argued that the mark "is only suggestive, and that Examining Attorney William Breckenfeld "has engaged in 'mental leaps' and 'syllogistic approximations' in finding the mark to be merely descriptive. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
The BAYER (breath fresheners) application is on appeal, while the HEINEKEN (meat juices) application remains pending.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:58 am
In re Jaquez, Serial No. 76597151 (July 11, 2007) [not precedential].When Applicant Jaquez filed his Statement of Use, Examining Attorney John Dwyer concluded that the specimen did not support the mark shown in the application drawing. [read post]