Search for: "In re C. B-W"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 10:43 am
I'm intrigued to see the re-emergence of the term "nilihism" within the debate. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Most of the focus was probably on safe harbors b/c players were bigger on both sides: telcos v. big content providers. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
Bargaining: sometimes parties don’t show up to bargaining directly b/c they’d like to push issue to legislature or executive. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:27 am
If you’re selling merchandise: worry. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:45 am
Der wirtschaftliche Schaden in Europa wäre immens, wenn amerikanische Angebote nicht mehr genutzt werden könnten. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
§ 41.67(c)(1)(vii). [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 1:49 pm
Footnote: *Internal Revenue Code of 1939 §22(b)(5) cite in Taxation of Damages Awards and Settlement Payments Author: Robert W. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm
U.S., 62 F.3d 1258 1248, 1252 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Isom and 11 U.S.C. 522(c)(2)(B)). [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:02 am
And of course, keep in mind that certain tax forms which are sent to the IRS – like those forms 1099-B which report your capital gains – aren’t going to note that you’re taxed at a zero percent rate: they just offer reportable transactions. [read post]
27 Sep 2012, 6:34 pm
C. [read post]
8 May 2011, 9:22 pm
& structure of §§362 & 549 support view that §549(c) doesnt create an exception to automatic stay. http://ow.ly/4LLHn BK-TN: Counsel employed to defend the trustee individually may be paid from the estate like any other case professional. http://ow.ly/4LLQ5 BK-SDNY: Judge Drain explains at length why §546(e)'s safe harbor does not extend to the avoidance of an obligation. http://ow.ly/4LLX6 SDNY: BK ref. w/d re 1) does… [read post]
30 May 2019, 3:45 pm
§§ 342 or 343(w)) to comply with 21 CFR § 117.135(a)(1). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
W. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
MTM comes out the other way, consumers get different choices and behave differently b/c product mix is now different. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
That’s inconsistent w/1stAmendment b/c inconsistent of your right to determine what you want to say, though it’s truthful and beyond dispute (unless you are Greek Orthodox). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 11:44 am
If you paid too much, you’re due a refund. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
It’s good for fair use to answer these questions, b/c it provides the most robust set of factors to answer the question of whether an activity is ok. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am
May be harder to do b/c of DRM. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 9:48 am
& subrog. claims are solely BK issues not bound by State Ct holding that Bank owed Dbtr no duty http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/HarbourEastDevp-BK-SD-FL-Cristol-10-27-11.pdf … B-MA: Failure to comply w/FRBP 2002(c)(3) for notice of plan injunction precludes confirmation w/injunctive provisions. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/QuincyMedicalCtr-BK-D-MA-Hoffman-11-16-11.pdf … B-MA:… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:17 am
But—at least when the endorsers aren’t savvy as the Kardashians—they’re often just like the other people in their social circles—they find some things intuitive and some things confusing; they’re neither robots nor children. [read post]
