Search for: "In re C. W."
Results 481 - 500
of 3,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2019, 7:14 am
” Customers were allegedly misled to believe that C-Topical is FDA approved and choose to purchase C-Topical over Goprelto on that basis. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 5:27 am
("In 1993, I went on the road to watch Jeb run for governor in Florida and W. run for governor in Texas.... [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 6:13 am
Recently, the Nigerian Government decided to re-adopt the previous national anthem used in 1960-1978. [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Finally, w/r/t online: Congre [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
Commercial use doesn’t mean that we’re at commercial speech. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Christine Haight Farley: If you’re investigating policy impact, Byron is an outlier b/c he is an incredibly successful author, which means his strategies will be different. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Fashion: first mover + TM protection for brand name is arguably sufficient b/c of ephemerality of designs. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm
They are descriptive in her categorization b/c they are referring descriptively to what they’re fans of rather in a TM sense to the creator of that underlying work. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Gd luck w/that. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 11:03 am
Got married, and held a 3.9 GPA (mind you, when I first started school in 2000, I was put on Academic Probation; re-did those classes and got 4.0? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
C. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 4:57 pm
Cohen, BER-C-134-08, Hon. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:15 am
Andererseits hatte das Gericht entschieden, dass auch Art. 15 Abs. 1 lit. c DSGVO zum gleichen Ergebnis führen würde, sofern die DSGVO anwendbar wäre – zumindest im vorliegenden Zusammenhang mit Bonitätsabfragen: «[…] In der Lehre ist umstritten, wem das Wahlrecht zusteht. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
So even if we’re persuaded on TM use we have to think about the scope of that right. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:34 am
Res. [read post]
19 May 2016, 9:23 am
K-12 and disciplinary distinctions don’t make sense b/c we’re talking about educating students. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Reichman: yes, replacing it w/© like regime. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 10:55 am
” Section 58A(4) provides that “‘[w]hen a person is held under arrest for an offense listed in subsection (1) and upon a motion by the [C]ommonwealth, the judge shall hold a [dangerousness] hearing. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
Similarly, exacerbates tension on First Amendment interests b/c we have a merchandising claim at work—Court’s intuition that he should win does real damage to Rogersby finding the use artistically relevant, but also finding that b/c we’re in the same (merchandising) market, it might be explicitly misleading even though the defendant isn’t doing anything explicitly misleading.Porous markets: Excelled Sheepskin v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm
Res. [read post]
