Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 481 - 500
of 4,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
D, but ornamentality is interesting b/c it might divest you of rights, but also might help prove nonfunctionality for protection purposes. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
No. 18-cv-227, Complaint, ¶52 (D. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
Blanquet-Angulo, Alejandra “Les Zones d’ombre de la Convention de La Haye du 2 Juillet 2019”, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé (RIDC), 73 (2021), pp. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
Although lawyers are known as a querulous lot, statisticians may not be far behind. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
You put your right foot in You put your right foot out You put your right foot in And you shake it all about You do the Hokey Pokey and you turn yourself around That’s what it’s all about! [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:36 am
In re Kenzo Ltd., Serial No. 79272212 (May 23, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 6:13 am
Lee texts again: “But to do this, you’d have to act very soon. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
As explained by the majority in In re B, an appellate court is not required to conduct a fresh evaluation of whether a care order is necessary and proportionate. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:22 am
Smith, Law and Magic: An Introduction Out of a Hat Julie D. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 10:17 am
Smith, Law and Magic: An Introduction Out of a Hat Julie D. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
Or are questions like these irrelevant because, as the draft proclaims: “[W]e cannot allow our decisions to be affected by any extraneous influences such as concern about the public’s reaction to our work”? [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Brière, 2022 QCCDPHA 14 [49] Quoique la sanction qui aurait pu être imposée à l’issue de l’audition soit pertinente, le Conseil ne doit pas commencer son analyse par une comparaison entre cette sanction et la recommandation conjointe[28]. [50] Il doit plutôt débuter son analyse avec le fondement de la recommandation conjointe, incluant les bénéfices importants de cette dernière pour… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Last month, a federal appeals panel gave the back of its hand to Rep. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am
I'd like to use this post to explore that [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 3:31 am
In re Jordan Saglio, Serial No. 88593965 (May 31, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
If I am then I agree with Mr Dean that the court has to conduct a pure, fact-specific Re S balancing exercise. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm
Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) and In re Primus, 436 U.S. 412 (1978), as turning on the associational interests of the lawyers qua lawyers. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:23 am
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) also charged Republicans with robbing the lives of young children. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:05 am
They’re trading on random fluctuations; according to the EMH, what they’re doing is little better than gambling. [read post]
