Search for: "In re Marcus S." Results 481 - 500 of 773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2023, 1:49 am by Florian Mueller
The CMA's leaders saw yesterday that there is quite some skepticism of the agency's regulatory excess in the parliamentary committee they're accountable to. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:07 am
In this earlier post, Andrew Marcus explains why he favors the Canon Powershot A630 -- it's good, reasonably priced, takes AA batteries and has a swinging display screen that's handy for some shots. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm by Jim Hassett
As Stanley Marcus (former president of Neiman Marcus), put it (p. 22):  “You’re really not in business to make a profit, but you’re in business to render a service that is so good people are willing to pay a profit in recognition of what you are doing for them. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 2:19 am by rickgeorges
What Building a Country Requires (From the Daily Stoic) "It’s July 4th, 1776. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:31 am by Brian Cordery
Instead, UK patent lawyers are now faced with the reality of having to re-programme their minds to adjust to a brave new world where novelty and infringement are not necessarily two sides of the same coin. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:47 pm by David Kravets
Google declined to address Wysopal’s statement on the record. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:39 am by Keith Lee
While they’re busy crying over spilled milk, you can be the one people will be turning to when they’re in need. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:13 am by Florian Mueller
Marcus Grosch, said yesterday, it turned out that Apple originally didn't even deny infringement but focused on invalidity. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:42 pm
For example, suppose you're working with an older client with diminishing capacity whose will is sure to be contested. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm by Josh Blackman
Thomas does cite Judge Newsom's fascinating concurrence on Article III standing, which warrants a re-read. [read post]
 In the judgment, the Court re-emphasises its readiness to set the terms of a global FRAND licence and finds that as between Optis and Apple an annual lump sum of US$5.13m is FRAND for the portion of Optis’ portfolio(s) to which Apple requires a licence (just over 60%).[2] At 283 pages long, the judgment is not a quick read and therefore this article only scratches the surface of its contents. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm by Jonathan Bailey
Also, we’re going to keep this part extremely simple and basic. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am by Kiran Bhat
Douglas Berman of Sentencing Law and Policy observes that “a pretty sleepy sentencing Term for the Court could quickly become one of the most interesting to watch in recent years” if the Court were to grant cert. in two re-listed cases, Fisher v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the Texas Law Review, Jonah Gelbach of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and David Marcus of the University of Arizona Rogers College of Law argued that judicial review “seems to help legitimize systems of high volume agency adjudication. [read post]