Search for: "In re Marcus S."
Results 481 - 500
of 773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2009, 8:50 am
We’re in the dog days of August; we need to jazz it up a little. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:49 am
The CMA's leaders saw yesterday that there is quite some skepticism of the agency's regulatory excess in the parliamentary committee they're accountable to. [read post]
2 May 2007, 1:22 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Marcus T. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 8:07 am
In this earlier post, Andrew Marcus explains why he favors the Canon Powershot A630 -- it's good, reasonably priced, takes AA batteries and has a swinging display screen that's handy for some shots. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
RE Broker 2 John Brancato U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
As Stanley Marcus (former president of Neiman Marcus), put it (p. 22): “You’re really not in business to make a profit, but you’re in business to render a service that is so good people are willing to pay a profit in recognition of what you are doing for them. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 2:19 am
What Building a Country Requires (From the Daily Stoic) "It’s July 4th, 1776. [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:00 am
We're here to help. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:31 am
Instead, UK patent lawyers are now faced with the reality of having to re-programme their minds to adjust to a brave new world where novelty and infringement are not necessarily two sides of the same coin. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:47 pm
Google declined to address Wysopal’s statement on the record. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:39 am
While they’re busy crying over spilled milk, you can be the one people will be turning to when they’re in need. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 6:13 am
Marcus Grosch, said yesterday, it turned out that Apple originally didn't even deny infringement but focused on invalidity. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:42 pm
For example, suppose you're working with an older client with diminishing capacity whose will is sure to be contested. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Thomas does cite Judge Newsom's fascinating concurrence on Article III standing, which warrants a re-read. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
In the judgment, the Court re-emphasises its readiness to set the terms of a global FRAND licence and finds that as between Optis and Apple an annual lump sum of US$5.13m is FRAND for the portion of Optis’ portfolio(s) to which Apple requires a licence (just over 60%).[2] At 283 pages long, the judgment is not a quick read and therefore this article only scratches the surface of its contents. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 1:57 pm
Also, we’re going to keep this part extremely simple and basic. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Marcus Cole, Ronald D. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
It's purely procedural. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 7:58 am
Douglas Berman of Sentencing Law and Policy observes that “a pretty sleepy sentencing Term for the Court could quickly become one of the most interesting to watch in recent years” if the Court were to grant cert. in two re-listed cases, Fisher v. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming paper for the Texas Law Review, Jonah Gelbach of the University of Pennsylvania Law School and David Marcus of the University of Arizona Rogers College of Law argued that judicial review “seems to help legitimize systems of high volume agency adjudication. [read post]