Search for: "In re McKenna"
Results 481 - 500
of 557
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Lisa Ramsey, Reconciling Trademark Rights and Free Speech Locally and Globally Commentator: Rebecca Tushnet International element to the question of how to limit trademark to protect free speech. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
This is preclusion, or as Mark McKenna has called it, channeling. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
1st Breakout Session: Trademark TheoryHarms, Benefits, and Justifications in Trademark LawStacey Dogan© and patent are often considered to be about incentives (getting benefits), but TM law in the general view is about preventing harm/misinformation, at least in theory; misinformation can harm both producers and consumers. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
To get an idea of the kind of impressive work they're doing, check out this liveblog of day four of the hearings. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Taft also mocked Brandeis to Karger and other influential, anti-Zionist German Jews by claiming that Brandeis had been “metaphorically . . . re-circumcised” by his interest in Zionism. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm
In re Laverne: two bowl chairs (prior art). [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am
Buccafusco: We’re thinking about testing this. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:46 am
The concluding NAMSAP panel discussing "What is Affecting Stakeholders" provided a valuable, if overly brief, summary of the complex Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments re-shaping personal injury claim management and settlement planning. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 9:46 am
The concluding NAMSAP panel discussing "What is Affecting Stakeholders" provided a valuable, if overly brief, summary of the complex Federal and state legislative and regulatory developments re-shaping personal injury claim management and settlement planning. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Evident from usual surveys that courts accept that courts don’t really know what they’re trying to measure. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am
On the internet, no one knows that you’re not Lassie. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Don’t Assume You’re Getting Metadata With That - http://bit.ly/gyMABX (John Martin) Hon. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:57 am
When you look at law firm growth though, it was driven by demand, not by need to re-assure associates. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
This is why I am deeply skeptical of proposals to equate commercial and political speech when they're accompanied by promises that we'll remain protected against consumer fraud. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:12 am
The New York Times recently reported that former Washington Attorney General Rob McKenna was lobbying his former office less than a year after he left his position. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:29 am
“Just because you’re an arrogant SOB or philanderer, that’s not the same as committing a crime. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:21 pm
In 2007 McKenna, Long & Aldridge thought there had to be a "better way to [screen candidates] than the typical 20-minute interview process" and instituted a 30-minute online assessment over the objections of its lawyers who were "concerned that we'd be labeled as the weird firm. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 12:55 am
A newcomer to The Am Law 200, Goulston has lower revenue and profits per partner than other large Boston firms, but Goulston lawyers say they're happy to trade some profits for collegiality. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:21 am
The GM could “gift” some of the company’s products to someone else, who often then re-gifted that to someone they wanted to influence and so on and so forth. [read post]
