Search for: "In re TM"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,023
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2022, 8:56 am
Savvy companies have done so using a process such as IC Diagnostics (TM), which restructures, re-documents, and/or re-implements their IC relationships in a manner than maximizes IC compliance in a customized and sustainable manner consistent with their business models. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:42 pm
” This settlement should prompt other gig economy companies using independent contractors to take action that an increasing number of companies have taken: restructuring, re-documenting, and/or re-implementing their independent contractor relationships, using a process such as IC Diagnostics (TM), to enhance compliance with federal and state independent contractor laws. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
” As a result, more companies operating in that state have undertaken a process such as IC Diagnostics (TM) to restructure, re-document, and/or re-implement their IC relationships in a customized and sustainable manner to minimize misclassification liability. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:31 am
Patent students tend to be gobsmacked by abstraction and ambiguity of © and TM. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
You’re just updating for new tech, but these techs existed 100 years ago. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 3:28 am
" In re GO & Associates, LLC, Serial No. 88944728 (April 20, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:13 am
In re Scherr’s Cabinets & Doors, Inc., Serial No. 87685028 (September 18, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 9:12 am
In re Home Dynamix, LLC, Serial No. 87116576 (December 21, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge David K. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:48 pm
If you’re wondering what meaning existed with that name, try using your imagination before you search it on a work computer. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 3:34 pm
Even if we revised patent & TM law, nonfederal protected IP exists, such as common law copyright and state TMs. ? [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
.* The EPO: privileged and immune says the PresidentMerpel re-sinks her paws in the hot story of the decision that Hague Court of Appeal issued in the sadly famous proceedings in SUEPO v EPO [on which see her earlier post here]. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:17 am
Recognize that they’ll be pirated, but cared more about TM than textbook. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:39 am
With respect to TMs, the Chinese TM examination does not take into account whether someone else owns the TM outside of China, or if it is a famous TM outside of China. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:34 am
TM: That’s right. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 2:01 pm
(TM) Reader-contributed taglines: Harrison Pensa: In any case. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
But they’re not so bashful about American predecessors. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:55 am
One of those other entities is currently authorized by the FDA to manufacture DRX 9000 devices, because it re-listed the 510(k) clearance with the FDA this year. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:48 am
In case you're looking for a roadmap for leave to amend: Ideavillage Products Corp. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:28 am
First, they’re subject to Rule 9(b), unlike trademark claims subject to Rule 8, because courts have said so. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 8:21 am
But Select Comfort failed to show irreparable harm on trademark infringement because “there is a very narrow universe of search scenarios whereby a consumer might be re-directed to Mattress Firm’s website, and once such a consumer is, he will know immediately that he cannot purchase Select Comfort products at Mattress Firm. [read post]
