Search for: "In re TM"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2014, 3:52 am
Note the "TM" next to CASHFLOW UNITS, not "SM. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 12:29 am
Cir. 1988); In re G.B.I. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:11 am
See, right off the bat we’re going counterintuitive here, because I would have thought that if there’s a bread angle on the hammer, it refers to the milling process by which the flour is pounded, as if by Vulcan’s hammer, into fine bread for making fine bread. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
Their hearing rooms are typically spartan, their budgets subject to indiscriminate trimming, and often they must do clerical work that takes time away from their judcial functions.And don't forget that WCJs are humans too subject to all of the human frailties that afflict mankind, from personal problems to illnesses.Though exposed to only a couple of hours of the issues that confront WCJs I came away with a new found appreciation for the difficult job they do.Next time you see a WCJ tell them… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 3:32 am
When we're at a cocktail party and mention to some guest that we're in the workers' compensation business we often do so shamefully.Like we're embarrassed that we help manage the largest privatized social benefit system in the world.Or that we help people get back to work, help business manage safe practices, help the economy by spreading potentially catastrophic risk and keeping payroll tax dollars flowing. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Second Breakout SessionCopyright Fair UseRaw Materials and Creative WorksAndrew GildenRaw materials concept is part of transformativeness in copyright and right of publicity cases. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm
In TM, our circuit has insisted that it’s mostly not appropriate for a judge to evaluate likely confusion—we want outside evidence. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:21 pm
Instead, a moral sense that TM owners and not some third party deserve the results of their labor, absent some justification. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:31 am
.* Precedent III - is it res judicata? [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
No one created taxi medallions; they’re a gov’t entitlement. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
So they’re not lost. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:02 pm
If you’re familiar with Boylston Street in Boston, you’re disqualified from answering. [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:00 am
If you use a mark similar to a registered mark, for similar services, you're probably infringing. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:01 pm
Fireman & Company, through which I consult, is a value added re-seller for Elevate’s Cael LPM(tm) software. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:28 am
While the latter was denied, sanctions were awarded in the form of costs related to preparing the motion and re-deposition of the president, as well as the expert’s fees. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Sampling is illegal for tobacco, but they’re doing it. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
(1) Amicus participation: INTA and AIPLA despite the absence of any TM interest—the other half of the Lanham Act has arrived! [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 3:02 am
What if that were a "TM"? [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
Patent lawyers are stereotyped as more conservative/nerdy, but they’re kicking our ass in legislative reform. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
(They’re never going to stop complaining about foreign sites, though.) [read post]
