Search for: "In re the Estate of Bond" Results 481 - 500 of 957
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2013, 8:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
I do not own any real estate or other assets that would allow me to pay the court’s fees and costs order or use as collateral for a bond in the required amount. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 8:08 am by Keith A. Davidson
  We would much rather earn a big, fat probate fee or spend years litigating your estate after you’re gone. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 7:04 am
If the mineral owner also owns the surface estate, the lessee may seek to negotiate the right to landfarm pit contents in the lease itself. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:37 am by Peter Mahler
The risk can be mitigated to some degree by asking the court to require bonding of the fair value award. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 8:27 am by Matthew C. Bouchard, Esq.
  This outcome was amplified in July 2009 by similar orders of the Eastern District Bankruptcy Court in two separate proceedings: In re: Harrelson Utilities, Inc. and In re: Mammoth Grading, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 12:39 am by Kevin LaCroix
As the author of the Pillsbury memo notes, in a quote in the Reuters article, “Where the plaintiffs securities bar sees that they will get a return on their investment, they’re going to keep filing them. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
In terms of estate planning, financial advisors quite rightly point out that the holding of an investment portfolio provides for easier transfer of securities to beneficiaries, thereby avoiding the cost and hassle of re-registering share certificates. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:14 am
As set forth in the Prospectus, and elsewhere, the risks associated with the Fund are primarily attributable to the Funds investment in (1) real estate development bonds including speculative andquot;Dirt Bonds,andquot; which are secured only by bare, undeveloped land; (2) below investment-grade securities many of which were not even rated by an independent ratings agency; (3) illiquid securities including Tobacco Bonds; and (4) the Fund used leverage and… [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 9:46 am by Cicely Wilson
The court held that an equal treatment provision in the bonds barred Argentina from discriminating against plaintiffs’ bonds in favor of bonds issued in connection with the restructurings and that Argentina violated that provision by ranking its payment obligations on the defaulted debt below its obligations to the holders of its restructured debt. [read post]