Search for: "In the Interest of Jane Doe" Results 481 - 500 of 1,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 7:00 am by Phyllis Pollack
There is no ulterior motive; but, what Jane does not realize is that it creates a heavy psychological conundrum for me. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
When the judge insisted, Aaron divulged that the person being considered does not possess a security clearance. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit’s opinion does not discuss that theory, even though the district court had invoked it to certify the class. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 2:50 am by NCC Staff
Chief Justice Warren Burger decided that Roe and Doe, as well as the other cases that were scheduled on the docket, should go on as planned. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Eric Goldman
The “I am Jane Doe” crowd has lined up behind SESTA and views substitute FOSTA with hostility. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:04 am by Eric Goldman
The “I am Jane Doe” crowd has lined up behind SESTA and views substitute FOSTA with hostility. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am by John Elwood
Garza, 17-654, involves an unaccompanied teenager (known as “Jane Doe” to protect her privacy) who was caught trying to enter the United States illegally. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
, this post and this one), and Carter Phillips/Sidley Austin have filed a terrific brief in opposition on behalf of the Respondents, in which they (among other things) carefully explain why the SG’s accusations of ethical breaches by Jane Doe’s attorneys are groundless. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by David Luban
The government also wants the Court to take disciplinary action against Jane Doe’s counsel. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:39 pm by Marty Lederman
  In the Jane Doe case that was the subject of the October oral argument, the government insisted that this was the case even where, as there, abortion was illegal in the minor's county of origin (see p. 29).This "no undue burden because the minor can depart the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
  DOJ represented to the court of appeals that they the agency had discovered that Jane Doe was 19 years old, not 17, which would mean that HHS no longer had the authority to hold her. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:40 am
Moving him into retirement isn't much of a change, but enough was done to appease "Jane Doe," apparently. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 4:39 am by Lyle Denniston
   If she does not have the procedure quite soon, the pregnancy could be so far advanced that “Jane Poe” might soon lose the legal right to terminate. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:11 pm by Amy Howe
Roe permanent relief”: Although the trial court put its order on hold for 24 hours to give the government time to appeal, Roe is likely to obtain an abortion tomorrow night if the court does not act. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:07 am by Daniel J. Hemel, Eric A. Posner
Former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s guilty plea in federal court last week has awoken interest in the long-dormant Logan Act. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 1:00 pm by Sarah Grant
District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly’s order last month in Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:44 am by SHG
Suppose Jane Doe (16) gives legal assent to sex with Troy (30). [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]