Search for: "In the Matter of: Williamson"
Results 481 - 500
of 738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2011, 8:20 am
Indeed, isn't it a matter of interpretation whether this episode constitutes a triumph or tragedy? [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Once again, our old friend and colleague Paul Schwind is following an interesting ongoing case. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 5:51 am
Williamson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:08 am
The problem was, prosecutors like Williamson County DA John Bradley (from whose office Reyna recruited his first assistant because he admired Bradley's shop) used those mechanisms to fight DNA testing tooth and nail even in cases where innocence is plausible, often expending far more time and resources in opposition than would be taken up just by testing the evidence. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Best of all, we now know that hard work and competitiveness are what matter, not class. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Best of all, we now know that hard work and competitiveness are what matter, not class. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 4:53 am
But they also should encompass actions of the current Williamson County district attorney, John Bradley. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 8:39 am
And if Bradley truly was “investigating” the matter as he publicly proclaimed, why would he do it in such a way that he met with everybody at the same time in order to resolve conflicts in their memories? [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
It seems that as a practical matter, examinations of flawed forensics in the justice system virtually never result from the mature, public exercise of judgment aimed at seeking scientific truth but inevitably are cinched up in some taut, emotional knot by whatever painful, uncomfortable or inconvenient memories or secrets may be exposed if the flaw were to come to light in a particular case. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:30 am
"The requested (deposition) will thus involve an undue burden and invasion of his rights, including privacy rights," said the petition, filed on Anderson's behalf by his lawyer in the Morton matter, Mark Dietz. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:08 am
Anderson is now a state district judge in Willliamson County and said in his filing that he has 43 matters pending on his judicial docket and a previously scheduled medical procedure on the day defense attorneys have requested his presence. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:38 am
But for those willing to cheat to win, prosecutors are immune from civil penalties and except in rare events, face no professional consequences from the state bar disciplinary committee as a practical matter (though that group has announced they're investigating the Morton case). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 9:17 am
It matters not to me who was involved in that discovery. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
§ 1350, is a merits question or instead an issue of subject matter jurisdiction; and (2) whether corporations are immune from tort liability for violations of the law of nations such as torture, extrajudicial executions or genocide, or if corporations may instead be sued in the same manner as any other private party defendant under the ATS for such egregious violations. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 11:09 am
Indeed, when Craig Watkins suggested criminal sanctions for prosecutors withholding evidence, ironically that's the fix Williamson County DA John Bradley preferred! [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:55 am
"Those are serious matters," said Gerry Goldstein, one of the state's leading criminal defense lawyers whose San Antonio firm joined Morton's cause earlier this year. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 3:46 pm
Whether these "Brady violations," or failure to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense, stemmed from malice or incompetence matters little, certainly to Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 8:36 pm
Actual, measurable competitive effects are what matters for modern antitrust analysis, not presumptions about competitive consequences derived from the structure of a firm or harm to its competitors. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:49 am
"We are going to continue the investigation of those matters, because we regard them as extraordinarily serious," Scheck said after the hearing. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:10 pm
Actual, measurable competitive effects are what matters for modern antitrust analysis, not presumptions about competitive consequences derived from the structure of a firm or harm to its competitors. [read post]
