Search for: "J. P. v. S. S. and C. S." Results 481 - 500 of 3,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 7:37 am by Antonio Zuccaro
   Peel v Hamon J & C Engineering (Pty) Ltd: Ignoring the Result-Requirement of Section 163(1)(A) of the Companies Act and Extending the Oppression Remedy Beyond its Statutorily Intended ReachHGJ Beukes and WJC Swart http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2014volume17no4/2014%2817%294Beukes%26Swart.Note.pdf 15. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 11:14 am by WSLL
Case Name: MATTHEW OLIVER LEE v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
R v Magoon, 2016 ABCA 412 [51] The trial judge was alive to these concerns and applied the framework described by Moldaver J in Hart. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
HIRSCH, AN EMPLOYEE OF BORDER FOODS, INC. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:47 am by Bryan West
This raises the question of what the limits of that deference are, and whether there is any basis to apply this reasoning to a determination of an adjudicator appointed under construction legislation.[1]Such as that provided under Part 5 of the Prompt Payment and Construction Lien Act, RSA 2000 c P-26.4 the “PPCLA”, or Part II.1 of the Construction Act, RSO 1990 c C.30 Arad Incorporated v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Culkin, 162 N.E. 487 (N.Y. 1928), at p. 492, per Cardozo J., cited by Cory J. in Botiuk v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:40 pm
Comments Israeli-Palestinian Water Literature’s Misplaced Dependence Upon Customary International Law by Ian J. [read post]