Search for: "JOHN DOE, official and individual" Results 481 - 500 of 3,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2022, 9:51 am by Janet Stewart Scalley
The reason for this is also relatively obvious: individuals who are middle-aged and older are more likely to be closer to exiting the workforce than younger individuals, and in this way, the property division between the parties may, to some extent, need to fill in where income—and thus spousal support—might otherwise leave off. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Does that violate equal protection or Section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act? [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Lobbyists Connect Ukraine Officials with Powerful Allies to Help in War Against Russia CNBC – Brian Schwartz | Published: 3/15/2022 Lobbyists are working to connect Ukrainian officials with powerful allies in the U.S., including mayors, governors, and representatives of at least one firearm’s dealer to help the war-torn country in its fight against Russia. [read post]
” The court rejected this claim as well finding that the TEC “delineates between the authority of the Secretary of State and local officials. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Sidney A. Shapiro
When individuals participate in a regulatory process, for example, they are more likely to tell stories based on their individual experiences rather than use the reasoned discourse found in the managerial perspective. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 3:33 pm by Ilya Somin
" It does not follow, however, that there are no other state officials that plaintiffs can sue. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
Unfortunately, FOIA does not work that way. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:29 pm by Sarah Brannon
We implore state election officials to immediately take advantage of the opportunity this executive order would present. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 4:05 am by Peter Mahler
” LaPierre issued a letter to NRA members similarly stating that the NRA “seeks protection from New York officials who illegally abused and weaponized the powers they wield against the NRA and its members. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Much litigation ensues about the gov't officials' behavior. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by Eric Goldman
” There was no need to decide this issue because the court held “the government does not have a privacy or publicity interest in restricting speech critical of government officials or public figures in the trademark context—at least absent actual malice, which is not alleged here. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Officials are shielded [by qualified immunity] from civil liability "'insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.'" … The concept of ordered liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause has been interpreted to include "the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lobbying law defines an expenditure lobbyist as an individual who spends more than $5,000 influencing city business. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 9:50 am by Jane Turner
This was particularly helpful since an undercover agent like German needed predication to prove that individuals were engaged in criminal activity. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic, Molly E. Reynolds
Rather, they generally involve testimony and materials held by individuals other than Trump who participated in or have knowledge of events related to the insurrection. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Recent examples include the State of Georgia’s litigation to stop Carl Malamud and Public.Resource.Org from publishing the Official Code of Georgia Annotated in the United States (Georgia et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 8:28 am by Scott R. Anderson
In August 2021, just days after the fall of Kabul, a set of September 11th plaintiffs who received a judgment in the matter of John Does 1 through 7 v. [read post]
If the archivist does not agree, Subsection 2203(d) requires the president to provide a disposal schedule to “the appropriate Congressional Committees” 60 days in advance of destroying the records. [read post]