Search for: "Jack Balkin" Results 481 - 500 of 1,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2007, 9:34 am
Jack Balkin argues that the current Congress should amend the Presidential Succession Act to allow succession to remain within a political party. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:48 am
Malla PollackProfessor, American Justice School of Law SEQ CHAPTER h r 1 My deep thanks to Professor Jack Balkin for graciously responding to an email criticizing his draft of Original Meaning and Constitutional Redemption, with an invitation to publish my criticism on his own blog. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by JB
In this masterful new interpretation, Jack Balkin returns the I Ching to its rightful place as a book of wisdom that teaches how to live one's life in a changing and confusing world. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:56 pm by Ilya Somin
But I would first like to thank Jack Balkin and the other regular bloggers here at Balkinization for this opportunity to guest-blog at one of the top websites focusing on law and politics. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:15 am by Ilya Somin
(Ilya Somin) At Balkinization, Yale law professor Jack Balkin emphasizes the fact that the health insurance industry supports the Obama health care bill’s individual mandate requiring most Americans to buy health insurance. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 11:18 am by Steve Bainbridge
Jack Balkin implicitly compares the state attorneys general challenging Obamacare's individual mandate to  tax protesters. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
Here is the abstract:In Abortion and Original Meaning, Jack Balkin presents a new argument, based on his reconstruction of the principles that animated the Fourteenth Amendment, for the soundness of the result, though not the reasoning, of Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 9:01 am by Neil Siegel
Participants will include Matthew Adler, Jack Balkin, Stuart Benjamin, James Boyle, Erwin Chemerinsky, Guy Charles, Robert Cooter, Mark Hall, Gillian Metzger, Abigail Moncrieff, Arti Rai, Barak Richman, Theodore Ruger, Stephen Sachs, Neil Siegel, Ilya Somin, and Ernest Young.A description of the conference and a link to the conference agenda are available here.The event is open to the public. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 3:07 pm by David Kopel
Participants were Randy Barnett (Georgetown, VC), Jack Balkin (Yale),  Gillian Metzger (Columbia), and me (Denver, VC). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:33 am
Original meaning theory--with Jack Balkin a leading contributor--appears to be the hottest (that is, most discussed by academics) theory of constitutional interpretation today. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Jack Balkin: [I]f total repeal is not on the table, the insurance industry's interest is in keeping the individual mandate and thus opposing any attempt to hold it unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 1:29 pm
Savage, reporting on a survey of law professors which included respondents "Jack Balkin, Yale; Mary L. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am by Howard Wasserman
Jack Balkin (among several other commentators) argues that we are in the midst of an emerging constitutional crisis, over the rules and norms of the Senate and the uses to which they are being put.* The routine filibuster--in which the GOP speaks, acts, and is perceived as controlling the Senate by having 41 out of 100 seats--was the start. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:59 pm
Jack Balkin's theory of progressive orignalism is one of my very favorite legal topics. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:29 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And in my own lengthy article of introduction, I conclude by acknowledging the debate between between Jack Balkin and myself over the respective weight of "constitutional rot" and "constitutional design. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Balkin, The Cycles of Constitutional Time (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:57 pm
I am inspired by some of the responses to Jack Balkin's last post on Heller; I agree completely with Jack's argument, and I'm curious about the implications of some of the respondents' arguments.Let's assume that it is legitimate to use a firearm to hunt, and let's even assume that that's what anyone in the late 18th century would (properly) have believed and, indeed, what many Americans have believed since then. [read post]