Search for: "John Doe #2" Results 481 - 500 of 13,729
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Hobbs Leans on Lobbyists in New Administration: How does she prevent conflicts? [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am by Michael Dreeben
(Bivens provides a cause of action for individuals alleging a violation of certain constitutional rights by the federal government; § 1983 does the same for allegations against state governments.) [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Francis Scholar, Rutgers Law SchoolCriminal Law (1:30 – 2:45 pm)Tracey Maclin, Raymond & Miriam Ehrlich Chair in U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
The combination of Articles 2 and 19 TEU has led to a novel reading of the substantive commitments of Member States. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Considered on its own, the 30-minute episode (if, in fact, it lasted that long) does not support issuance of the civil harassment restraining order. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
No matter how much authority over all the parameters of railroad competition the ICC was granted—and such authority was considerable[2]—the system of railroad regulation proved susceptible to industry capture and political influence. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The 12th Amendment does not require a winning candidate to receive a majority of the Electoral votes that are in theory available (538). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm by Josh Blackman
"Will Baude clerked for Chief Justice John Roberts and is among the most distinguished scholars there is. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Bush Administration and for John McCain's 2008 presidential campaign). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:48 pm by Amy Howe
And we are deeply troubled that the State enacted a map that the State readily admits does not provide the remedy we said federal law requires. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 7:36 am by Unknown
By John Filar AtwoodCardone Capital argues in a reply brief that the Supreme Court should resolve lower court disagreements over the bespeaks caution doctrine and the interpretation of “statutory seller” under the 1933 Act. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:40 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
However, in Sahota v The Home Office [2010] 2 CMLR 29, the Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that the decision in Mayr applies only to the later stages of treatment. [read post]