Search for: "Johnson v. Superior Court" Results 481 - 500 of 635
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 9:32 am by Burton A. Padove
In a lawsuit filed in Johnson County Superior Court, the plaintiff asserts there is a history of car accidents along that section of roadway that gave the state’s transportation department actual or constructive knowledge that safety improvements were necessary. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 1:58 pm
The case went before a Los Angeles Superior Court jury consisting of 5 men (one African-American) and 7 women. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Last week in the courts Between 27 November and 1 December 2023, Collins Rice J continued to hear the trial in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, January 6 and January 13 conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:13 pm by David Lat
Superior Court just ruled that the burger fumes from Rogue States must be abated immediately.Judge Mott ordered Rogue States to stop its grilling operations by the end of today. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm by Barry Barnett
Superior Court of California, No. 16-466, slip op. at 7 (U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:07 am by Russ Bensing
The biggest was the Ohio Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/824762.no1.pdf Division One Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
Viscomi had abused her discretion on several key issues.[1] The New Jersey appellate court reversed the trial court’s judgment, and remanded the Lanzo case for a new trial, in a carefully reasoned decision.[2] Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  Bail refers to cash that is provided to court administration that is returned at the end of the case. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the December 9, January 6, January 13 and January 19 conferences)   Johnson v. [read post]