Search for: "Jones v. No Defendants Named"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2014, 10:36 am
In the Ontario case of Morland-Jones v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
This makes Greene’s point important enough to deserve a name: How about “agonistic legitimation”? [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:12 am
The individual members of the Board, although not named as individuals defendants, are identified by name in the complaint. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. 14; Hislop v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
Abbott individually and d/b/a Awesome Place Bar & Grill and Awesome Place Bar and Grill, LLC d/b/a Awesome Place Bar & Grill, all of Mishawaka, Indiana illegally intercepted and televised Ultimate Fighting Championship 145: Jon Jones v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Jones v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
MEREDITH CORPORATION v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm
Jenni Alvies is a non-affiliate who began posting on Facebook under the name “Crossfit Mamas” (selling exercise apparel bearing the same name), and CrossFit felt Alvies was infringing its mark. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:00 am
Martinez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:14 am
Awad v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:36 am
Jones, 2005 WL 2284283 (U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:46 pm
The defendants in the case of Professional Massage Training Center, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 11:36 pm
HA Jones Co.. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Jones, 2014 U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 6:29 am
On 14 January, the European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Jones v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm
Drug and Device Law’s readership, so far as we could tell, consisted of (1) other lawyers at large firms who defended pharmaceutical product liability cases, (2) plaintiffs’ lawyers who labored on the opposite side of that “v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:39 am
The DMLP returned to the Sixth Circuit in Jones v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 12:05 am
Let’s assume that when DOJ appeals Judge Leon’s opinion in Klayman v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am
At Inter Alia, the online companion to the Yale Law and Policy Review, Brian Christopher Jones uses United States v. [read post]
