Search for: "Justice v. State Compensation Director" Results 481 - 500 of 673
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm by Edith Roberts
In 2017, in United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
This case concerns a dispute between the claimant film director and the film’s producer over a film called “La Mula”. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Highlights from the SSP Educational Program: Legal Landscape - Arthur Bryant, Executive Director of Public Justice, and Daniel Cohen, Public Affairs Legal Counsel for American Association for Justice, provided strategic analysis of the current legislative and litigation landscape from a consumer and plaintiff perspective. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:15 am
Those recordings and phonograms had been produced and then broadcast by national broadcasting companies.The claimants successfully sued INA to obtain compensation for the infringement of the performers’ rights which they held.The TGI Paris considered that, despite the wording of Article 49, INA was not exempted from having to obtain a performer’s prior authorization for the use of the fixation of their performances. [read post]
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm by Lev Sugarman
.: The Center for Strategic and International Studies will host a briefing, Future of the Rule of Law, CICIG, and Justice Reform in Guatemala, featuring Representative Norma Torres (D-CA), and an expert panel including Brittany Benowitz, Ambassador William Brownfield, Leah Campos, Claudia Escobar, Peter Lamport and Mark L. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
Justice Belobaba applied the test for assumed jurisdiction as set out in Muscutt v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 6:55 am by Tina Shin
The Bureau’s auto finance scrutiny focused on pricing and dealer compensation policies. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:10 am by INFORRM
The rationale for such strict contempt laws is that they compensate for the fact that in Britain, unlike the United States, we have very limited jury vetting and so prejudicial material must be especially carefully controlled before and during the trial. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
PUBLIC CITIZEN'S 2011 PRIORITIES FOR AMERICARescuing Our DemocracyJanuary 21 marks the first anniversary of the catastrophic Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 11:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
Umesh Pratapa In the following guest post, Umesh Pratapa takes a look at the state of liability insurance in India. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Currently, the guidance states that suspects charged with offences should be named, however the draft guidance tells forces that they “must consider their data protection obligations as well as the need for open justice and transparency. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – AG Steve Marshall Accuses Alabama Ethics Director Tom Albritton of ‘Self-Dealing’ from Charitable Trust AL.com – Mike Cason | Published: 3/1/2023 State Attorney General Steve Marshall accused Alabama Ethics Commission Director Tom Albritton of improperly benefiting from a charitable trust for which Albritton was a board member because Albritton’s children received more than… [read post]