Search for: "Kay v. Kay" Results 481 - 500 of 1,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
For some time now, the worldwide food supply has been under attack by a bacterium we know well as a generally non-trouble-making resident of the human colon (Escherichia coli), which has lately been possessed of a terrible "new" weapon in the form of Shiga toxin. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
Lambeth LBC v Kay [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465; [2006] H.L.R. 22, per Lord Nichols [61] and Lord Hope [64]. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, (heard 3 April 2012 by Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) will be handed down on 19 July 2012. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 3:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
  (The denial on the due process issue came in the case of Al-Madhwani v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 12:51 pm by Paul Caron
Kay Bell notes that H&R Block's flashy campaign -- Superhero Economics: Bruce Wayne (Batman) v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:12 am by INFORRM
On 11 July 2012, there are applications in the cases of Qadir v Associated Newspapers and Tilbrook v Parr. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved complaints include: Mrs Lorna Leckie v The Scottish Sun, Mr Andrew Curtis v The Sun, Dr Kalind Parashar v Daily Mail and Councillor James Moher v Brent & Kilburn Times. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
There are some very nice and straightforward clarifications in the recent Federal Court decision inWarman v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:09 am by Margot Patterson
  The Supreme Court of Canada set out six factors to determine whether dealing with a work is “fair” (see CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by FT
In the judgment Kay LJ finds that the central question of the case is whether the decision of the Review Panel amounted to confirmation of the original decision to seek an order for possession or not. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
Today’s House Natural Resources Committee, meeting in Room 1324 of the Longworth House Office Building, held the latest in what has turned into a multi-year series of hearings on the federal government’s payment of attorney fees to plaintiffs bringing Endangered Species Act lawsuits. [read post]