Search for: "Kelly v. Administrator" Results 481 - 500 of 675
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
25 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 23 from 2012: HV 8599 G8 K45 2012 This side of silence : human rights, torture, and the recognition of cruelty Tobias Kelly. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
This article examines these wrongful life cases, especially in light of the contradicting outcomes in different jurisdictions across the world, with the Dutch Kelly case and the South African decision in Stewart v Botha as its main examples. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
An administrative decision denying an application for accidental disability retirement vacated because of a lack of evidence in the record supporting the determination Baranowski v Kelly, 2012 NY Slip Op 04208, Appellate Division, First Department A New York City police officer filed an Article 78 petition seeking to vacate the denial of his application for accidental disability retirement based on a work-related incident involving his carrying an individual from a… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:55 am by SHG
The fact that the New York City Police Department has openly and flagrantly chosen to ignore DeBour (that's the New York flavor of Terry v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:08 pm by WSLL
Appellant requested a contested case hearing, and the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) upheld the Division’s determination. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
By Kelly HollowellUnder Section 134 of the Patent Act of 1952, if a patent application is denied by the USPTO, the applicant may file an administrative appeal with the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, with appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under Section141. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
By Kelly HollowellUnder Section 134 of the Patent Act of 1952, if a patent application is denied by the USPTO, the applicant may file an administrative appeal with the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, with appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit under Section141. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:58 am by WSLL
  After a contested case hearing, the Office of Administrative Hearings (OAH) upheld the Division’s denial of benefits, ruling that the procedure was necessitated by a preexisting congenital defect in Appellant’s lumbar spine and not his prior work related injuries. [read post]