Search for: "Kent Scheidegger"
Results 481 - 500
of 601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am
Kent Scheidegger reports at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:26 am
Our own Kent Scheidegger disagrees with the Graham decision and "extending it to homicides would be wrong squared. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:36 am
"Opponents of the death penalty then intentionally make that process more expensive and time-consuming than necessary by spamming [corrections officials] with a flood of irrelevant comments decrying the death penalty generally," said Kent Scheidegger, legal director of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a Sacramento-based foundation that represents the interests of victims' rights groups and law enforcement.Deborah Denno, a Fordham University law professor who… [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 12:37 pm
"It's a good reason not to go further down the same road," said CJLF legal director Kent Scheidegger. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the court yesterday sent a case back to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces to determine whether a military statute of limitations barred a 2014 prosecution for a rape that occurred in 2005. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger predicts that the appeals filed by Texas inmate Abel Ochoa, whose execution is scheduled for tonight at 6:00 p.m. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 4:28 am
Amy Howe reports on the decision for this blog; commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:04 pm
Legal Director Kent S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:27 am
The Court did not offer an explanation for its action, but at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his “best guess,” which Orin Kerr (at the Volokh Conspiracy) considers a “pretty good guess. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:19 am
Commentary on the decision comes from Noah Feldman, who argues at Bloomberg View that, “[o]n closer examination . . . the decision is less satisfying than it appears”; from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who observes that there “is already a movement afoot to remove IQ ceilings from the definition of intellectual disability altogether” and argues that the movement “must not succeed” in the context of eligibility for the death… [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
” Commentary on the majority opinion comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences, who writes that it contains “the strongest statement of the unquestionable constitutionality of capital punishment that I have ever seen in an opinion of the Court. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:04 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that “[t]he Court has not given a green light to police officers to stop every car registered to a person with a suspended or revoked license[:] Although the stop was upheld in this case, officers would be well advised to get a look at the driver to see if he matches the sex and approximate age on license, at least, before making the stop. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger argues that Smith’s case “was not a clean” one in which to decide whether “the jury and not the judge” must “make the additional findings that state law requires before a ‘death-eligible’ defendant is actually sentenced to death,” “although the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:01 am
” With commentary at Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger disputes Erwin Chemerinsky’s inclusion (in an article for the ABA Journal) of the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule among the areas in which Justice Anthony Kennedy “was the fifth vote for a liberal result, and where it is uncertain, or even unlikely, that Kavanaugh would decide the same way. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Commentary on yesterday’s decision in King comes from Laurence Tribe in The Boston Globe, Linda Greenhouse in The New York Times, Adam Zimmerman at PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman at PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re at PrawfsBlawg, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, Richard Pierce at the George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, Leland Beck at the Federal Regulations Advisor, Lisa Keen of the Keen News Service, Joan Krause at Hamilton and… [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger offers his “initial impressions” of the oral argument, and concludes that “[w]ith this many splits among the Justices, there is no predicting the outcome. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 5:13 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reacts to the latter editorial, expressing surprise that “we would read the words ‘Donald Trump is right’ in a New York Times editorial about anything, but especially about one of the Left’s favorite jurists. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
” Kent Scheidegger weighs in at Crime & Consequences on the court’s refusal to exercise its original jurisdiction to consider the dispute, agreeing with Justice Clarence Thomas, who dissented from the order, that the court’s discretionary approach to these cases may violate the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:20 pm
You might want to try Kent Scheidegger at the CJLF in Sacramento. [read post]
