Search for: "LEE v. LITTLE" Results 481 - 500 of 1,122
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Lee, 15-446, would interest only Kooks: The case presents two specialized questions involving the standards applied by the Patent and Trial Appeal Board (PTAB) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings and whether a court of appeals can review the PTAB’s decision to institute an IPR proceeding. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 9:55 pm by Florian Mueller
Even though things that judges say at a hearing are not the same as an actual decision, the mere fact that the Federal Circuit has expressed massive doubts about those patents already validates my skepticism.A little less than two years ago, the trial in the second California Apple v. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California judge who ruled on Findley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm by Bill Marler
  Headache and low-grade fever may also accompany this illness. [5, 25, 33]  People infected with norovirus usually recover in two to three days without serious or long-term health effects. [5, 25] Although symptoms usually only last one to two days in healthy individuals, norovirus infection can become quite serious in children, the elderly, and immune-compromised individuals. [10, 18, 33] In some cases, severe dehydration, malnutrition, and even death can result from norovirus infection,… [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am by Steve Vladeck
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
The first case Rosie looked at in detail was John Kaldor v Lee Ann Fashions (mentioned in the NIPC blog here), in which Kaldor found in M&S's Per Una collection, a dress  (illustrated, below left) bearing a pattern of a kind which he had disclosed to Lee Ann under a non-disclosure agreement (illustrated, above, left). [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:18 pm by Sophia Cope
Related Issues: PrivacyLaw Enforcement AccessRelated Cases: Warshak v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 2:27 pm by Mark Jaycox
Even an amendment (#2612) offered by by Senator Al Franken, which narrows some of the definitions in CISA, does little to clarify its most troubling provisions. [read post]