Search for: "LEON v. UNITED STATES"
Results 481 - 500
of 761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2011, 8:45 am
That legislation contains a provision that authorizes the president to indefinitely imprison, without a criminal charge or court hearing, any suspected terrorist who is captured within the United States -- including American citizens. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:58 pm
Salon has a piece on United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Thus, a case like State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 9:00 am
Briggs (1986) in denying the officers qualified immunity, and whether Malley and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 am
The Ninth Circuit last week in United States v, Grant held that Tapia applied not only to the original sentence but also to violations of supervised release conditions. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:19 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
Leon issued his decision below. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
” In an op-ed for Forbes, Frank Miniter argues that the Court should hold that warrantless GPS tracking is a violation of the Fourth Amendment in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:49 am
Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:18 am
Bout’s defense, of the United Nations’ documents, showed that reports of expert groups of UNO Security Council to Angola, Sierra Leone and Somalia, where he was mentioned as “head of the biggest illegal arm trade network”, in fact does not consist any proof of any unlawful activity by V. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 7:37 pm
Like Vance v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 5:09 pm
The interesting point is that in granting the third trial the appellate court relied on two cases, one of them being United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
” See Leon, supra, at 919, 908, n. 6 (quoting United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:43 am
Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
P. 26(f) (United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Utah) District of Vermont Rule 26. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
