Search for: "LITTLE v. HOLDER"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,866
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2018, 6:06 am
People's United Bank, NA v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
The order was drafted so poorly that it was unclear for days whether permanent resident aliens (that is, green-card holders) from the banned countries would be allowed to reenter the United States. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 1:40 pm
From Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Holder, Kavanaugh would have found that “the Anti-Injunction Act, which carefully limits the jurisdiction of federal courts over tax-related matters,” deprived the panel of jurisdiction to decide the constitutional issues in the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:08 pm
Holder), and overruled earlier decisions involving antitrust (Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
§ 411(a) when the copyright holder delivers the required application, deposit and fee to the Copyright Office, as the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Patents began as little more than feudal favors. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 10:18 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 am
Whilst the EU legislation states that something like these website blocking injunctions must be available to rights owners, it provides very little guidance on precisely what these should look like, how courts should deal with applications, and, particularly, how costs should be determined. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:41 pm
As he puts it, season ticket holders get season-long swag. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm
In Benisek v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:39 pm
From People v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 2:31 am
Website-blocking injunctions are sought by rights-holders in their own commercial interest. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 2:26 pm
Bemco Cash & Carry Inc., 2018 ONCA 239:[4] …The law is unsettled as to whether a Canadian trademark holder can prevent this activity.With respect, there is little if anything that is “unsettled” about this question. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
The case, DRK Photo v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:01 pm
Holder (D.D.C. 2013). [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:18 am
SPC has supported national innovation policy through issuing an outline on judicial intellectual property (IP) protection, hearing and closing 683,000 IP cases, working on strategies to deal with the issue for both Chinese and foreign IP holders that in China, IP infringement is low cost but protecting IP rights is high cost, trying the Jordan case and the Huawei v. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am
Congress could have put the burden of policing infringement in suspicious circumstances on the provider, but it instead put it on the copyright holder. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
