Search for: "Land v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 6,727
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 8:29 am by Paul R. Recupero
United States, which created multiple tests for what constituted “waters of the United States. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The constitutional protection the state receives in Chapter 9 bankruptcy regarding its sovereignty to organize its internal political units effectively subsidizes its decisions to favor suburban jurisdictions at the expense of central cities or any local government unit whose fiscal position is undermined by the state allowing competing subdivisions to form on its periphery. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 5:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: In addition to its stunning internal flaws, the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Oklahoma v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm by John McFarland
Today the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear Ammonite Oil & Gas Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:29 am by Patricia Salkin
The United States District Court, District of Oregon, (the “Court”) heard argument on Plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:38 am by John Floyd
    This exception was evidenced by a May 10, 2023 decision, United States v. [read post]
  Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
In simple terms, the government cannot take your land and then decide later what to do with it without running afoul of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, as applied to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment.Absent “urban blight,” or other exceptions which weren’t present here, the AD4 annulled the Town’s efforts to acquire the Mall property and awarded the owner its fees and costs.Not that’s… [read post]
25 May 2023, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The Sacketts sued, alleging that their property was not “waters of the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am by Ilya Somin
In collecting taxes, the new Government of the United States could seize and sell only "so much of [a] tract of land . . . as may be necessary to satisfy the taxes due thereon. [read post]