Search for: "Landmark Legal Foundation" Results 481 - 500 of 751
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
The judge said the statutes could not survive First Amendment scrutiny in light of recent landmark U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
If popular sovereignty is to survive, it will require more than the commitment of an elite corps of legal scholars. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 6:26 am by Amy Howe
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Anastasia Boden discusses the amicus brief that PLF recently filed in support of certiorari in Minority Television Project v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Rose Falconer
In a landmark decision earlier this week on 15 April 2014, the Indian Supreme Court recognised transgender as the third category of gender. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Karen Tani
Ackerman anchors his discussion in the landmark statutes of the 1960s: the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
That the Intoxilyzer S-D2 is listed as a devise approved to test blood alcohol content does not establish that the devise is admissible at trial to prove the defendant was legally intoxicated. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:21 am by Dennis Crouch
 Building upon the strong foundation of AIA reforms, on February 14, 2013, President Obama stated that “our efforts at patent reform only went about halfway to where we need to go. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:57 am by JMBM Global Hospitality Group®
Better-than-expected results for 2013 will lay a solid foundation for continued growth and profitability over the next several years. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:57 am by JMBM Global Hospitality Group®
Better-than-expected results for 2013 will lay a solid foundation for continued growth and profitability over the next several years. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 1:52 pm by assoulineberlowe
” In its Amicus Curiae Brief supporting the Broadcasters Petition, the Washington Legal Foundation argues that the Second Circuit’s reasoning is faulty. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:34 pm by Marty Lederman
 Or consider another example from the Court's own Free Exercise jurisprudence:  In Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 10:05 am by Ruby Powers
Key anti-immigrant research discredited: The Heritage Foundation published a report in April that reform opponents hoped to use against the Senate bill. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am by Florian Mueller
But no matter what the decision (which will come down a few months after the hearing) may ultimately be, the legal process won't end at that point, unless the parties settle.With a view to next week's appellate hearing I thought I'd put together this Q&A document that I hope will help those following the case very closely (including those who will attend the appellate hearing) as well as those who haven't looked at this matter recently but would like to get a recap of the high-level… [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm by Amy Howe
This result, they contend, flows from the Court’s landmark decision in Mathews v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:10 am by Terry Hart
Justifying Intellectual Property is a landmark work that provides a solid theoretical foundation to “what may be called the metaphysics of the law. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am by Howard Knopf
  Why do these documents make concessions on fundamental legal issues that are far from being clearly resolved? [read post]